Cited by 193Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Academic self-efficacy and academic procrastination as predictors of problematic internet use in university students

Odaci, Hatice·2011·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.005

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Odaci, H.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
1109-1113
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994654501
Cited by
193
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
33.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
problematic internet use, internet addiction, academic self-efficacy, academic procrastination, university students, field of study differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review