The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluations of an artificial intelligence instructor's voice: Social Identity Theory in human-robot interactions
Abstract
Abstract This study employs the Computers are Social Actors (CASA) paradigm to extend the predictions of Social Identity Theory (SIT) to human-robot interaction (HRI) in the context of instructional communication. SIT posits that individuals gain a sense of personal worth from the groups with which they identify. Previous research has demonstrated that age group identification is meaningful to individuals’ self-concepts. Results demonstrated that higher age identified students rated the older A.I. voice instructor (representing an out-group member) higher for credibility and social presence and reported more motivation to learn than those students with low age identification. Implications are discussed for SIT and design features of computerized voices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153 · Cited by 4,022
Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement
McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759909376464 · Cited by 1,236
Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222250405 · Cited by 737
Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices
Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x · Cited by 670
Nass, C., & Lee, K. M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.7.3.171 · Cited by 522
Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoeia: computers as social actors
Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E., & Reeder, H. (1993) · INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 conference companion on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '93 · doi:10.1145/259964.260137 · Cited by 162
Walther, J. B., & Bazarova, N. N. (2008) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650208321783 · Cited by 137
Cited by
Almost human? A comparative case study on the social media presence of virtual influencers
Arsenyan, J., & Mirowska, A. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102694 · Cited by 566
ChatGPT and consumers: Benefits, Pitfalls and Future Research Agenda
Paul, J., Ueno, A., & Dennis, C. (2023) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12928 · Cited by 345
Kim, J., Merrill, K., Xu, K., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1801227 · Cited by 288
Human-machine collaboration in managerial decision making
Haesevoets, T., De Cremer, D., Dierckx, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106730 · Cited by 280
The effect of gender stereotypes on artificial intelligence recommendations
Ahn, J., Kim, J., & Sung, Y. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.007 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Stoll, B., Lin, X., & Massey, N.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 90
- Pages
- 357-362
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2887919024
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 20.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
