The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Thanks for watching”. The effectiveness of YouTube vlogendorsements
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This study examines the effectiveness of brand endorsements in vlogs (video blogs) by assessing the role of audience participation, parasocial relationship, and valence toward vlog endorsements on the perceived credibility of the vlogger and brand attitudes. Four experimental conditions were created on Qualtrics based on a YouTube vlog where the endorser reviewed a few products. The data were collected using Mturk and analyzed with 203 usable responses. The findings indicate that audience participation in the vlog enhances para-social relationship with the vlogger, thus further fostering the vlogger's perceived credibility as an endorser. Additionally, the valence of the audience's attitudes toward vlog endorsements moderates the audience participation–parasocial relationship. The results show that vlogs with high levels of audience participation are more likely to increase the acceptance of the brand's endorsement via enhanced credibility perceptions among viewers. Hence, time should be spent choosing vloggers who are active in the online community. This study contributes to the understanding of the distinct characteristics of vlogs that specifically affect endorsement effectiveness. The focal role of parasocial relationship for message acceptance in the context of vlogs is also highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611
Handbook of Affective Sciences
(2002) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195126013.001.0001 · Cited by 5,073
Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 · Cited by 4,380
Ohanian, R. (1990) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191 · Cited by 4,043
The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2695840 · Cited by 3,936
Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication
Bandura, A. (2001) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0303_03 · Cited by 3,386
The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence
Pornpitakpan, C. (2004) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x · Cited by 2,205
The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84 · Cited by 2,038
Cited by
Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-aho, V. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2019.1708781 · Cited by 671
Self-citationMasuda, H., Han, S. H., & Lee, J. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121246 · Cited by 576
Ladhari, R., Massa, E., & Skandrani, H. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027 · Cited by 557
Guo, Y., Zhang, K., & Wang, C. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102786 · Cited by 398
Right-Wing YouTube: A Supply and Demand Perspective
Munger, K., & Phillips, J. (2022) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161220964767 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Munnukka, J., Maity, D., Reinikainen, H., & Luoma-aho, V.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 93
- Pages
- 226-234
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904940415
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 30.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Thanks for watching”. The effectiveness of YouTube vlogendorsements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.014
- The paper
- Munnukka, J., Maity, D., Reinikainen, H., & Luoma-aho, V. (2019). “Thanks for watching”. The effectiveness of YouTube vlogendorsements. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.