Cited by 107Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Cyber-bullying and cyber-victimization among undergraduate student teachers through the lens of the General Aggression Model

Kokkinos, Constantinos M., Antoniadou, Nafsika·2019·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.007

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kokkinos, C. M., & Antoniadou, N.
Affiliations
Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
Corresponding author
Kokkinos, Constantinos M.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
98
Pages
59-68
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2939087246
Cited by
106
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
12.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Information and Communication Technologies
  • ICT
  • CB
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyber victimization, General Aggression Model, Big Five personality traits, problematic internet use, compulsive internet use, online disinhibition effect, loneliness, attachment, psychopathology, neuroticism, agreeableness, extraversion, conscientiousness, hostility, anxiety, depression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review