Cited by 72Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Impacts of online risky behaviors and cybersecurity management on cyberbullying and traditional bullying victimization among Korean youth: Application of cyber-routine activities theory with latent class analysis

Choi, Kyung-Shick, Cho, Sujung, Lee, Jin Ree·2019·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.007

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, K.-S., Cho, S., & Lee, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Cho, Sujung
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
100
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952473917
Cited by
72
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyber victimization, cybersecurity management, adolescents, online social networking, Korean youth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review