The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human-machine collaboration in managerial decision making
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach
Kumar, D. A., Balasubramanian, S., Byeon, D. H., & Manerkar, P. G. V. (1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 22,188
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2870052 · Cited by 6,294
A law of comparative judgment.
Thurstone, L. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0070288 · Cited by 5,077
Personality trait structure as a human universal.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.5.509 · Cited by 4,234
Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments
Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004 · Cited by 3,450
Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000033 · Cited by 3,232
Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007 · Cited by 2,772
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0072 · Cited by 2,755
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Brynjolfsson, 2017, The business of artificial intelligence, Harvard Business Review, 1
- David, 1963, Vol. 12
- Samek, 2019, Vol. 11700
- Schrage, 2017, 4 models for using AI to make decisions, Harvard Business Review
- Wilson, 2018, Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces, Harvard Business Review, 96, 114
- Wilson, 2016, How one clothing company blends AI and human expertise, Harvard Business Review
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bankins, S., Ocampo, A. C., Marrone, M., Restubog, S. L. D., & Woo, S. E. (2024) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2735 · Cited by 799
Cao, G., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102312 · Cited by 571
“, 2021) and it is still unclear if and when people are willing to cooperate with machines (Haesevoets et al., 2021), although conditions favoring information technology (IT) acceptance have long been seen as a central pillar in research into IT innovations (Verdegem and De Marez, 2011).”
BackgroundThe rise of artificial intelligence – understanding the AI identity threat at the workplace
Mirbabaie, M., Brünker, F., Möllmann Frick, N. R. J., & Stieglitz, S. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00496-x · Cited by 362
Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted HRM: Towards an extended strategic framework
Malik, A., Budhwar, P. S., & Kazmi, B. A. (2022) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100940 · Cited by 340
Kong, H., Yin, Z., Baruch, Y., & Yuan, Y. (2023) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103928 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Haesevoets, T., De Cremer, D., Dierckx, K., & Van Hiel, A.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Haesevoets, Tessa
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 119
- Pages
- 106730
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3128394414
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 78 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 25.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Universiteit Gent
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Keywords
- human-machine collaboration, management decision-making, artificial intelligence in organizations, acceptance of AI, decision-making power, human control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
