The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human-machine collaboration in managerial decision making
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach
Kumar, D. A., Balasubramanian, S., Byeon, D. H., & Manerkar, P. G. V. (1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 22,188
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2870052 · Cited by 6,294
A law of comparative judgment.
Thurstone, L. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0070288 · Cited by 5,077
Personality trait structure as a human universal.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.5.509 · Cited by 4,234
Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments
Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004 · Cited by 3,450
Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000033 · Cited by 3,232
Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007 · Cited by 2,772
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0072 · Cited by 2,755
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298
Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
Ligęza, A. (1995) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/0925-2312(95)90020-9 · Cited by 1,867
Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19 · Cited by 1,640
Lee, M. K. (2018) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951718756684 · Cited by 1,338
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2643 · Cited by 1,230
Deep Learning for Identifying Metastatic Breast CancerPreprint
Wang, D., Khosla, A., Gargeya, R., Irshad, H., & Beck, A. H. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05718 · Cited by 1,028
Hill, J., Randolph Ford, W., & Farreras, I. G. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.026 · Cited by 856
A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making
Burton, J. W., Stein, M., & Jensen, T. B. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2155 · Cited by 814
Systematic Analysis of Breast Cancer Morphology Uncovers Stromal Features Associated with Survival
Beck, A. H., Sangoi, A. R., Leung, S. C. Y., Marinelli, R. J., Nielsen, T. O., van de Vijver, M. J., West, R. B., van de Rijn, M., & Koller, D. (2011) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002564 · Cited by 780
People are averse to machines making moral decisions.
Bigman, Y. E., & Gray, K. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.003 · Cited by 738
Devaraj, S., Easley, R. F., & Crant, J. M. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0153 · Cited by 716
Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future
Peregrina, Á. F. A. (2018) · Economía industrial · Cited by 681
Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing
von Krogh, G. (2018) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2018.0084 · Cited by 641
The Feeling Economy: Managing in the Next Generation of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Huang, M.-H., Rust, R., & Maksimovic, V. (2019) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125619863436 · Cited by 591
How artificial intelligence is changing drug discovery
Fleming, N. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05267-x · Cited by 546
Stubborn Reliance on Intuition and Subjectivity in Employee Selection
Highhouse, S. (2008) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00058.x · Cited by 498
Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
Mireille Hildebrandt, C. C., & del Castillo, C. C. (2020) · doi:10.1145/3351095 · Cited by 486
Attachment and trust in artificial intelligence
Gillath, O., Ai, T., Branicky, M. S., Keshmiri, S., Davison, R. B., & Spaulding, R. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106607 · Cited by 448
Web Acceptance Model (WAM): Moderating effects of user experience
García, J. A. C., Muñoz‐Leiva, F., & Martínez, T. L. (2007) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.02.003 · Cited by 413
Svendsen, G. B., Johnsen, J.-A. K., Almås-Sørensen, L., & Vittersø, J. (2011) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2011.553740 · Cited by 409
klaR Analyzing German Business Cycles
Weihs, C., Ligges, U., Luebke, K., & Raabe, N. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-28397-8_36 · Cited by 403
Augmenting the algorithm: Emerging human-in-the-loop work configurations
Grønsund, T., & Aanestad, M. (2020) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101614 · Cited by 364
The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future
PARMAN, J. J. (2017) · Technology|Architecture + Design · doi:10.1080/24751448.2017.1292803 · Cited by 335
The relative influence of advice from human experts and statistical methods on forecast adjustments
Önkal, D., Goodwin, P., Thomson, M. E., Gonul, M. S., & Pollock, A. C. (2009) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.637 · Cited by 331
Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. P. (2017) · Cited by 313
Information Displays and Decision Processes
Kleinmuntz, D. N., & Schkade, D. A. (1993) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00265.x · Cited by 309
Groom, V., & Nass, C. (2007) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.8.3.10gro · Cited by 306
Feeling our way to machine minds: people's emotions when perceiving mind in artificial intelligence
Shank, D. B., Graves, C., Gott, A., Gamez, P., & Rodriguez, S. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.001 · Cited by 293
Edwards, C. C., Edwards, A. P., Stoll, B., Lin, X., & Massey, N. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.027 · Cited by 286
Toward Acceptable Domestic Robots: Applying Insights from Social Psychology
Young, J. E., Hawkins, R., Sharlin, E., & Igarashi, T. (2008) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-008-0006-y · Cited by 280
Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments
Green, B., & Chen, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287563 · Cited by 275
Hoffman, M., Kahn, L. B., & Li, D. (2018) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjx042 · Cited by 261
Business Artificial Intelligence
Jiménez-Pastor, A. (2021) · Fundació Parc Científic Universitat de València eBooks · doi:10.7203/pcuv-9 · Cited by 253
Bader, V., & Kaiser, S. (2019) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508419855714 · Cited by 232
Suen, H.-Y., Chen, M. Y.-C., & Lu, S. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.012 · Cited by 231
Fildes, R. A., & Goodwin, P. (2007) · INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics · doi:10.1287/inte.1070.0309 · Cited by 225
Beyond design and use: How scholars should study intelligent technologies
Bailey, D. E., & Barley, S. R. (2019) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100286 · Cited by 215
Metcalf, L., Askay, D. A., & Rosenberg, L. B. (2019) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125619862256 · Cited by 197
The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future
Kelly, K. T. (2016) · Cited by 184
Data Analysis and Decision Support
Baier, D., Decker, R., & Schmidt-Thieme, L. (2005) · Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization · doi:10.1007/3-540-28397-8 · Cited by 179
Trusting Intelligent Machines: Deepening Trust Within Socio-Technical Systems
Andras, P., Esterle, L., Guckert, M., Han, T. A., Lewis, P. R., Milanovic, K., Payne, T., Perret, C., Pitt, J., Powers, S. T., et al. (2018) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2018.2876107 · Cited by 153
Just How Smart Are Smart Machines
Davenport, T. H., & Kirby, J. (2016) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 135
Lay Perceptions of Selection Decision Aids in US and Non-US Samples
Diab, D. L., Pui, S.-Y., Yankelevich, M., & Highhouse, S. (2011) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00548.x · Cited by 121
Wang, J., Molina, M. D., & Sundar, S. S. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106278 · Cited by 106
prefmod: AnRPackage for Modeling Preferences Based on Paired Comparisons, Rankings, or Ratings
Hatzinger, R., & Dittrich, R. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i10 · Cited by 102
What People Want From Their Professionals: Attitudes Toward Decision‐making Strategies
Eastwood, J., Snook, B., & Luther, K. (2012) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.741 · Cited by 97
Datification, Organizational Strategy, and IS Research: What’s the Score?
Markus, M. L. (2017) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2017.08.003 · Cited by 90
Dittrich, R., Hatzinger, R., & Katzenbeisser, W. (1998) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · doi:10.1111/1467-9876.00125 · Cited by 82
How Human–Computer “Superminds” Are Redefining the Future of Work
Malone, T. W. (2019) · Why Humans Matter More Than Ever · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12450.003.0010 · Cited by 81
Machines as Teammates: A Collaboration Research Agenda
Seeber, I., Bittner, E. A. C., Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, G., de Vreede, T., Druckenmiller, D. A., Maier, R. K., Merz, A. B., Oeste-Reiß, S., Randrup, N., et al. (2018) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.055 · Cited by 74
Hoffman, M., Kahn, L., & Li, D. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21709 · Cited by 58
AI Challenges in Human-Robot Cognitive TeamingPreprint
Chakraborti, T., Subbarao Kambhampati, B., Scheutz, M. J., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.04775 · Cited by 58
What people want from their professionals: attitudes toward decision-making strategies
(2013) · Strategic Direction · doi:10.1108/sd.2013.05629daa.011 · Cited by 48
Building a More Intelligent Enterprise
Schoemaker, P. J. H., & Tetlock, P. E. (2019) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11859.003.0014 · Cited by 45
Sinclair, C. D. (1982) · Lecture notes in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5771-4_16 · Cited by 35
RADAR: automated task planning for proactive decision support
Grover, S., Sengupta, S., Chakraborti, T., Mishra, A. P., & Subbarao Kambhampati, B. (2020) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2020.1726751 · Cited by 26
Digital Today, Cognitive Tomorrow
Rometty, G. (2018) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11645.003.0004 · Cited by 25
B-PaDY: robot co-worker in a bumper assembly line
Kinugawa, J., Kanazawa, A., & Kosuge, K. (2016) · ROBOMECH Journal · doi:10.1186/s40648-016-0064-0 · Cited by 4
IRIBE, M., Maeta, N., Endo, G., TAKUBO, T., Ohira, M., & KINUGASA, T. (2016) · ROBOMECH Journal · doi:10.1186/s40648-016-0053-3 · Cited by 2
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Brynjolfsson, 2017, The business of artificial intelligence, Harvard Business Review, 1
- David, 1963, Vol. 12
- Samek, 2019, Vol. 11700
- Schrage, 2017, 4 models for using AI to make decisions, Harvard Business Review
- Wilson, 2018, Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces, Harvard Business Review, 96, 114
- Wilson, 2016, How one clothing company blends AI and human expertise, Harvard Business Review
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bankins, S., Ocampo, A. C., Marrone, M., Restubog, S. L. D., & Woo, S. E. (2024) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2735 · Cited by 799
Cao, G., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102312 · Cited by 571
“, 2021) and it is still unclear if and when people are willing to cooperate with machines (Haesevoets et al., 2021), although conditions favoring information technology (IT) acceptance have long been seen as a central pillar in research into IT innovations (Verdegem and De Marez, 2011).”
BackgroundThe rise of artificial intelligence – understanding the AI identity threat at the workplace
Mirbabaie, M., Brünker, F., Möllmann Frick, N. R. J., & Stieglitz, S. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00496-x · Cited by 362
Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted HRM: Towards an extended strategic framework
Malik, A., Budhwar, P. S., & Kazmi, B. A. (2022) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100940 · Cited by 340
Kong, H., Yin, Z., Baruch, Y., & Yuan, Y. (2023) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103928 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Haesevoets, T., De Cremer, D., Dierckx, K., & Van Hiel, A.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Haesevoets, Tessa
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 119
- Pages
- 106730
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3128394414
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 78 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 25.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Universiteit Gent
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Keywords
- human-machine collaboration, management decision-making, artificial intelligence in organizations, acceptance of AI, decision-making power, human control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
