Cited by 33Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Swipe right? Using beauty filters in male Tinder profiles reduces women's evaluations of trustworthiness but increases physical attractiveness and dating intention

Open access
Appel, Markus, Hutmacher, Fabian, Politt, Theresa, Stein, Jan-Philipp·2023·Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract

Mobile dating apps are popular platforms to initiate romantic relationships that provide several means for idealized self-presentation—such as the possibility to modify one's photos with the help of beauty filters. Connecting and extending prior theory and research, a model on the influence of filter use on potential dating partners' perceived trustworthiness and attractiveness is proposed. We conducted a pre-registered online experiment (N = 241), showing that (hetero- or bisexual) women perceive male Tinder users with filtered photos (as compared to the same users with unfiltered photos) as more physically attractive—but as less trustworthy. The more attractive and trustworthy the profile owner was perceived, the more likely the women were inclined to date him. Attractiveness had a greater influence on women's dating intention than trustworthiness, leading to a positive overall effect of filter use on dating intention, irrespective of photo-editing experience. Implications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107871

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Applying beauty filters enables individuals to optimize their physical appearance without much effort or expertise.

    “For instance, applying beauty filters enables individuals to optimize their physical appearance without much effort or expertise (e.g., Appel et al., 2023).”

    From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Appel et al., 2023

  • Beautifying practices go beyond superficial changes and may include significant modifications (such as adjusting the shape of the nose or the contour of the jawline).

    “Crucially, these beautifying practices go beyond superficial changes (such as adjusting color saturation) and may include significant modifications (such as adjusting the shape of the nose or the contour of the jawline).”

    From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Appel et al., 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Appel, M., Hutmacher, F., Politt, T., & Stein, J.-P.
Affiliations
University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Appel, Markus
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
148
Pages
107871
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383887987
Cited by
33
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2021: 1
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
beauty filters, dating apps, Tinder, self-presentation, physical attractiveness, perceived trustworthiness, image editing, gender differences, bisexual women, romantic relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review