Swipe right? Using beauty filters in male Tinder profiles reduces women's evaluations of trustworthiness but increases physical attractiveness and dating intention
Open accessAbstract
Mobile dating apps are popular platforms to initiate romantic relationships that provide several means for idealized self-presentation—such as the possibility to modify one's photos with the help of beauty filters. Connecting and extending prior theory and research, a model on the influence of filter use on potential dating partners' perceived trustworthiness and attractiveness is proposed. We conducted a pre-registered online experiment (N = 241), showing that (hetero- or bisexual) women perceive male Tinder users with filtered photos (as compared to the same users with unfiltered photos) as more physically attractive—but as less trustworthy. The more attractive and trustworthy the profile owner was perceived, the more likely the women were inclined to date him. Attractiveness had a greater influence on women's dating intention than trustworthiness, leading to a positive overall effect of filter use on dating intention, irrespective of photo-editing experience. Implications are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Applying beauty filters enables individuals to optimize their physical appearance without much effort or expertise.
“For instance, applying beauty filters enables individuals to optimize their physical appearance without much effort or expertise (e.g., Appel et al., 2023).”
From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Appel et al., 2023
Beautifying practices go beyond superficial changes and may include significant modifications (such as adjusting the shape of the nose or the contour of the jawline).
“Crucially, these beautifying practices go beyond superficial changes (such as adjusting color saturation) and may include significant modifications (such as adjusting the shape of the nose or the contour of the jawline).”
From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Appel et al., 2023
Cites
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266350 · Cited by 3,543 · see citing works
Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 · Cited by 2,429 · see citing works
The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence
Pornpitakpan, C. (2004) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x · Cited by 2,205 · see citing works
Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement
McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759909376464 · Cited by 1,236 · see citing works
Walther, J. B. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002 · Cited by 915 · see citing works
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Lai, C.-H. (2011) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650210377091 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating
Heino, R. D., Ellison, N. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2010) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407510361614 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Shen, C., Kasra, M., Pan, W., Bassett, G. A., Malloch, Y., & O’Brien, J. F. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818799526 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Uploading your best self: Selfie editing and body dissatisfaction
Tiggemann, M., Anderberg, I., & Brown, Z. (2020) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.03.002 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters
Gulati, A., Martínez-Garcia, M., Fernández, D., Lozano, M. A., Lepri, B., & Oliver, N. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.240882 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model
Hutmacher, F., Appel, M., & Schwan, S. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2384125 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Appel, M., Hutmacher, F., Politt, T., & Stein, J.-P.
- Affiliations
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Appel, Markus
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-11
- Volume
- 148
- Pages
- 107871
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4383887987
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- beauty filters, dating apps, Tinder, self-presentation, physical attractiveness, perceived trustworthiness, image editing, gender differences, bisexual women, romantic relationships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review