Cited by 70Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning Development

Facial Expression Production and Recognition in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Open access
Keating, Connor Tom, Cook, Jennifer Louise·2020·Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America

Abstract

Social "difficulties" associated with ASD may be a product of neurotypical-autistic differences in emotion expression and recognition. Research suggests that neurotypical and autistic individuals exhibit expressive differences, with autistic individuals displaying less frequent expressions that are rated lower in quality by non-autistic raters. Autistic individuals have difficulties recognizing neurotypical facial expressions; neurotypical individuals have difficulties recognizing autistic expressions. However, findings are mixed. Task-related factors (e.g., intensity of stimuli) and participant characteristics (e.g., age, IQ, comorbid diagnoses) may contribute to the mixed findings. The authors conclude by highlighting important areas for future research and the clinical implications of the discussed findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chc.2020.02.006

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social challenges do not lie solely within an Autistic person-they are relational, meaning that the interactional partner shares responsibility for preventing and remedying misunderstandings and social rejection.

    “Providers must also understand that social challenges do not lie solely within an Autistic person—they are relational, meaning that the interactional partner shares responsibility for preventing and remedying misunderstandings and social rejection (Davis & Crompton, 2021; Keating & Cook, 2020; Milton, 2012; Sasson et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keating, C. T., & Cook, J. L.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Cook, Jennifer Louise
Venue
Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
557-571
ISSN
1056-4993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015907530
Cited by
70
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Birmingham
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, facial expressions, emotional expression, emotion recognition, social cognition, facial expression intensity, comorbidities, clinical implications
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review