The DOI matches its Crossref record; 226 of the 237 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fourth generation biofuel from genetically modified algal biomass: Challenges and future directions.
Abstract
Genetic engineering applications in the field of biofuel are rapidly expanding due to their potential to boost biomass productivity while lowering its cost and enhancing its quality. Recently, fourth-generation biofuel (FGB), which is biofuel obtained from genetically modified (GM) algae biomass, has gained considerable attention from academic and industrial communities. However, replacing fossil resources with FGB is still beset with many challenges. Most notably, technical aspects of genetic modification operations need to be more fully articulated and elaborated. However, relatively little attention has been paid to GM algal biomass. There is a limited number of reviews on the progress and challenges faced in the algal genetics of FGB. Therefore, the present review aims to fill this gap in the literature by recapitulating the findings of recent studies and achievements on safe and efficient genetic manipulation in the production of FGB. Then, the essential issues and parameters related to genome editing in algal strains are highlighted. Finally, the main challenges to FGB pertaining to the diffusion risk and regulatory frameworks are addressed. This review concluded that the technical and biosafety aspects of FGB, as well as the complexity and diversity of the related regulations, legitimacy concerns, and health and environmental risks, are among the most important challenges that require a strong commitment at the national/international levels to reach a global consensus.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additional biocontainment methods can be directly based on genetic changes inside the production cells such as auxotrophies or kill switches, significantly decreasing the risk of genetically modified organism (GMO) escape [44,81].”
From The potential of biofuels from first to fourth generation (2023) · cites this paper as [81]
In the citing paper
“For example, genetically modified microalgae exhibit heightened productivity, environmental tolerance, and resistance to insects [22].”
From A Holistic Approach to Circular Bioeconomy Through the Sustainable Utilization of Microalgal Biomass for Biofuel and Other Value-Added Products (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
Items 201–226 of 226
EvolvR-ing to targeted mutagenesis
Sadanand, S. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4247 · Cited by 12
How the US CRISPR patent probe will play out
Ledford, H. K. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/531149a · Cited by 11
Batchu, N. K., Khater, S., Patil, S., Nagle, V. L., Das, G., Bhadra, B., Sapre, A. V., & Dasgupta, S. (2018) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.03.004 · Cited by 11
Patents in the time of CRISPR: Who owns gene editing?
Sherkow, J. S. (2016) · The Biochemist · doi:10.1042/bio03803026 · Cited by 10
Who owns CRISPR-Cas9 in Europe?
Kupecz, A. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3086 · Cited by 9
A Toxin-Antitoxin System VapBC15 from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 Shows Distinct Regulatory Features
Fei, Q., Gao, E., Liu, B., Wei, Y., & Ning, D. (2018) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes9040173 · Cited by 9
Agricultural biotechnology in India: impacts and controversies
Qaim, M. (2014) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9780857938350.00014 · Cited by 9
Ejesieme, O. V., Vorster, N., Riaza, J., Dugmore, G., & Zeelie, B. (2020) · Journal of Energy in Southern Africa · doi:10.17159/2413-3051/2020/v31i1a6430 · Cited by 9
Kerr, W. A., & Kerr, W. A. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.244909 · Cited by 8
Algal Biofuel: A Promising Alternative for Fossil Fuel
Shokravi, H., Shokravi, Z., Aziz, M. A., & Shokravi, H. (2019) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429327773-11 · Cited by 8
Self-citationKinetics study of the photocatalytic inactivation of Escherichia coli
Khani, M., Amin, N. A. S., Hosseini, S. N., & Heidarrezaei, M. (2016) · International Journal of Nano and Biomaterials · doi:10.1504/ijnbm.2016.086106 · Cited by 7
Self-citationThe continuously evolving CRISPR barcoding toolbox
Gaj, T., & Pérez‐Piñera, P. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1541-y · Cited by 7
Evolution at the Cutting Edge: CRISPR-Mediated Directed Evolution
Abbott, T. R., & Qi, L. S. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.027 · Cited by 7
Prospective Applications of Synthetic Biology for Algal Bioproduct Optimization
Khraiwesh, B., Jijakli, K., Swift, J., Chaiboonchoe, A., Abdrabu, R., Chao, P.-W., Yen, L., & Salehi‐Ashtiani, K. (2015) · Biofuel and biorefinery technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16640-7_8 · Cited by 6
Trade Agreements and Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Belcher, K. W. (2007) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781847205469.00051 · Cited by 5
Kerr, W. A. (2019) · Agrekon · doi:10.1080/03031853.2019.1605299 · Cited by 5
Taming the Bear: The WTO after the Accession of Russia
Kerr, W. A., & Kerr, W. A. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.126671 · Cited by 4
Srivastava, A., & Torres‐Vargas, C. E. (2016) · Advances in environmental engineering and green technologies book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1683-5.ch006 · Cited by 4
Fontana, G. (2010) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.3303/cet1020001 · Cited by 4
Abu‐Ghosh, S., Ronen, B., Feingold, D., Banet, G., Dubinsky, Z., & Iluz, D. (2019) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-019-01859-w · Cited by 4
Safe, secure and ethical? : assessing and regulating risks associated with synthetic biology
Regårdh, P. C. (2011) · Cited by 3
THE BIOSAFETY PROTOCOL AND ITS SOCIO‐ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SEEDS OF DISCORD
Müller, F. G. (2004) · International Journal of Environmental Studies · doi:10.1080/0020723032000119019 · Cited by 3
Liu, Y., & Cheng, J. J. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527825394.ch7 · Cited by 3
A Cutting-edge IP Litigation: the European Front of CRISPR Patent War
Sanguanini, M. (2018) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.25563 · Cited by 1
DNA Sequence Assembly and Annotation of Genes
Christensen, H. K., & Moodley, A. (2018) · Learning materials in biosciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99280-8_2 · Cited by 1
Cas9 nuclease platform for microalgae genome engineering
Daboussi, F., Beurdeley, M., & Juillerat, A. (2014) · Cited by 1
Flagged first, then by citations
11 of the 237 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Brookes, 2021, Economic and environmental impact of genetically modified crops in Asia Pacific, Genet. Modif. Crop. Asia Pacific, 9
- Lee, 2016, High-performance empirical analysis of metabolic pathways in microalgae using cell-free system
- Sanner, 2016, The struggle for CRISPR: a billion dollar question in intellectual property, U. Ill. JL Tech. Pol’y, 431
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomass Energy and Biofuels: Perspective, Potentials, and Challenges in the Energy Transition
Mignogna, D., Szabó, M., Ceci, P., & Avino, P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16167036 · Cited by 248
New trends on crude glycerol purification: A review
Attarbachi, T., Kingsley, M., & Spallina, V. (2023) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127485 · Cited by 225
The potential of biofuels from first to fourth generation
Cavelius, P., Engelhart-Straub, S., Mehlmer, N., Lercher, J., Awad, D., & Brück, T. (2023) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002063 · Cited by 224
Verdía, P., Choudhary, H., Nakasu, P. Y. S., Ghatta, A. A., Han, Y., Hopson, C., Aravena, R. I., Mishra, D. K., Ovejero-Pérez, A., Simmons, B. A., et al. (2025) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00754 · Cited by 210
Zhang, Y., Zhong, Y., Lu, S., Zhang, Z., & Tan, D. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10061178 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Shokravi, H., Shokravi, Z., Heidarrezaei, M., Ong, H. C., Rahimian Koloor, S. S., Petrů, M., Lau, W. J., & Ismail, A. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
- Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch (IR)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Technical University of Liberec (CZ)
- Corresponding author
- Ong, Hwai Chyuan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 285
- Pages
- 131535
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3181545766
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 237
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Keywords
- fourth-generation biofuels, genetically modified algae, algal biomass, genome editing, biosafety, risk assessment, biofuel regulation, environmental risk
- MeSH terms
- Genetic Engineering, Plants, Biomass, Biofuels, Microalgae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review