Cited by 326Child Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesChild Welfare and Adoption

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exposure to childhood sexual and physical abuse and subsequent educational achievement outcomes

Open access

Abstract

Objective This paper examined the relationship between exposure to sexual and physical abuse (CSA and CPA) in childhood and later educational achievement outcomes in late adolescence and early adulthood in a birth cohort of over 1,000 children studied to age 25.Method Retrospective data on CSA and CPA were gathered at ages 18 and 21 and used to form a best estimate of exposure to CSA and CPA. The relationship between CSA, CPA, and self-reported educational outcomes to 25 years was examined using logistic regression models that took into account social background, parental factors, and individual factors.Results Increasing exposure to CSA and CPA was significantly associated with failing to achieve secondary school qualifications (CSA: B=.53, SE=.13, p<.0001; CPA: B=.62, SE=.12, p<.0001), gaining a Higher School Certificate (CSA: B=-.48, SE=.13, p<.001; CPA: B=-.78, SE=.14, p<.001), attending university (CSA: B=-.29, SE=.13, p<.05; CPA: B=-.45, SE=.13, p<.001), and gaining a university degree (CSA: B=-.54, SE=.18, p<.005; CPA: B=-.64, SE=.17, p<.001). Adjustment for confounding social, parental, and individual factors explained most of these associations. After control for confounding factors, omnibus tests of the associations between CSA and outcomes and CPA and outcomes failed to reach statistical significance (CSA: Wald chi(2) (4)=7.72, p=.10; CPA: Wald chi(2) (4)=8.26, p=.08).Conclusions The effects of exposure to CSA and CPA on later educational achievement outcomes are largely explained by the social, family, and individual context within which exposure to abuse takes place.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.022

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Elley, 1976, Revised socio-economic index for New Zealand, New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 11, 25

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Boden, J. M., Horwood, L. J., & Fergusson, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Fergusson, David M.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
31
Issue
10
Pages
1101-1114
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094613980
Cited by
323
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
child sexual abuse, child physical abuse, academic performance, secondary school qualifications, college attendance, university degree attainment, late adolescence, early adulthood, parental factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Data Collection, Educational Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, New Zealand, Retrospective Studies, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review