Cited by 57Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthChild Development and Digital TechnologySexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Associations between blocking, monitoring, and filtering software on the home computer and youth-reported unwanted exposure to sexual material online

Ybarra, Michele L., Finkelhor, David, Mitchell, Kimberly J., Wolak, Janis·2009·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objective To examine the relationship between the use of preventive software on the home computer and unwanted exposure to sexual material online. Methods The Youth Internet Safety Survey-2 was a national, RDD telephone survey conducted in March-June 2005. Eight hundred households (one caregiver and one child between the ages of 10 and 17 years) with home Internet access answered questions pertaining to Internet prevention activities in the household and adolescent behaviors and exposures online. Results Unwanted exposure to sexual material occurred in 32% of youth in homes with pop-up/spam blockers and 25% of youth in homes with filtering, blocking, or monitoring software on the home computer, compared to 43% of households without preventive software installed on the home computer. Among otherwise similar youth, pop-up/spam blockers installed on the home computer were significantly associated with 59% lower odds of reporting unwanted exposure to sexual material on the home computer; and filtering, blocking, or monitoring software was significantly associated with 65% lower odds. When data were stratified by youth sex, associations between preventive software and unwanted exposure were similar for boys and girls. When stratified by age, preventive software was associated with significantly reduced risk of unwanted exposure for 10-12-year olds and 13-15-year olds, but not for 16-17-year olds. Conclusion Although these correlational analyses are far from providing conclusive evidence that preventive software protects children from unwanted exposure to sexual material online, findings suggest that caregivers of boys and girls 15 years of age and younger who want to reduce the likelihood of unwanted exposure to sexual material on the home computer should consider including preventive software-especially filtering, blocking, or monitoring software-in their Internet safety plan. Practice implications Practitioners should partner with caregivers in developing an Internet safety plan, including proactive caregiver-youth discussions about expected Internet behavior appropriate for their household.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.015

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence base supporting the widespread use of Internet filtering is currently weak.

    “Given studies on this topic are few in number and the findings are decidedly mixed, the evidence base supporting the widespread use of Internet filtering is currently weak.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ybarra, M. L., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Wolak, J.
Affiliations
University of New Hampshire (US)
Corresponding author
Ybarra, Michele L.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
857-869
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081857131
Cited by
57
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
internet filtering software, home computer use, child online safety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Computers, Erotica, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Software Design, Computer Security, Internet, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review