Associations between blocking, monitoring, and filtering software on the home computer and youth-reported unwanted exposure to sexual material online
Abstract
Objective To examine the relationship between the use of preventive software on the home computer and unwanted exposure to sexual material online. Methods The Youth Internet Safety Survey-2 was a national, RDD telephone survey conducted in March-June 2005. Eight hundred households (one caregiver and one child between the ages of 10 and 17 years) with home Internet access answered questions pertaining to Internet prevention activities in the household and adolescent behaviors and exposures online. Results Unwanted exposure to sexual material occurred in 32% of youth in homes with pop-up/spam blockers and 25% of youth in homes with filtering, blocking, or monitoring software on the home computer, compared to 43% of households without preventive software installed on the home computer. Among otherwise similar youth, pop-up/spam blockers installed on the home computer were significantly associated with 59% lower odds of reporting unwanted exposure to sexual material on the home computer; and filtering, blocking, or monitoring software was significantly associated with 65% lower odds. When data were stratified by youth sex, associations between preventive software and unwanted exposure were similar for boys and girls. When stratified by age, preventive software was associated with significantly reduced risk of unwanted exposure for 10-12-year olds and 13-15-year olds, but not for 16-17-year olds. Conclusion Although these correlational analyses are far from providing conclusive evidence that preventive software protects children from unwanted exposure to sexual material online, findings suggest that caregivers of boys and girls 15 years of age and younger who want to reduce the likelihood of unwanted exposure to sexual material on the home computer should consider including preventive software-especially filtering, blocking, or monitoring software-in their Internet safety plan. Practice implications Practitioners should partner with caregivers in developing an Internet safety plan, including proactive caregiver-youth discussions about expected Internet behavior appropriate for their household.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The evidence base supporting the widespread use of Internet filtering is currently weak.
“Given studies on this topic are few in number and the findings are decidedly mixed, the evidence base supporting the widespread use of Internet filtering is currently weak.”
From Internet Filtering and Adolescent Exposure to Online Sexual Material (2018) · cites this paper as [19]
Cites
Exposure to Internet Pornography among Children and Adolescents: A National Survey
Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2005) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.473 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parental Control vs. Teen Self-Regulation: Is there a middle ground for mobile online safety?
Wisniewski, P., Ghosh, A. K., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998352 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
The prevalence of unwanted online sexual exposure and solicitation among youth: A meta-analysis
Madigan, S., Villani, V., Azzopardi, C., Laut, D., Smith, T., Temple, J. R., Browne, D., & Dimitropoulos, G. (2018) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.03.012 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Helweg‐Larsen, K., Schütt, N., & Larsen, H. B. (2012) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02587.x · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Predictors of unwanted exposure to online pornography and online sexual solicitation of youth
Chang, F.-C., Chiu, C.-H., Miao, N.-F., Chen, P.-H., Lee, C.-M., & Chiang, J.-T. (2016) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105314546775 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: Parental Discussion, Protective Practices and Attitudes
Rudolph, J. I., Walsh, K., Shanley, D. C., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2022) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605211072258 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Internet Filtering and Adolescent Exposure to Online Sexual Material
Przybylski, A. K., & Nash, V. (2018) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0466 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“A pair of studies reporting on data collected in 2005, before the rise of smartphones and tablets, provides tentative evidence that Internet filtering might reduce the relative risk of young people countering sexual material.(19,20) A more recent study, analyzing data collected a decade after these papers, provided st…”
Result
- Authors
- Ybarra, M. L., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Wolak, J.
- Affiliations
- University of New Hampshire (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ybarra, Michele L.
- Venue
- Child Abuse & Neglect
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 857-869
- ISSN
- 0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081857131
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Keywords
- internet filtering software, home computer use, child online safety
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Computers, Erotica, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Software Design, Computer Security, Internet, Personal Autonomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review