CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 108Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recipients of children’s and adolescents’ disclosures of childhood sexual abuse: A systematic review

Manay, Natalia, Collin-Vézina, Delphine·2021·Child Abuse & Neglect
DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104192
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Disclosure of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) is a complex, multifaceted process with many barriers that are largely shaped by individual, familial, and systemic characteristics. Children and youth tend to withhold or delay disclosure for many years, such that most CSA goes unreported. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence regarding the pathways and recipients of CSA disclosures and to identify potential developmental and gender differences in the recipients of disclosures. Thirty-seven studies conducted between 1990 and 2017 were selected for review. Results indicated that children and youth follow a gradual pattern of disclosure, whereby they first disclose to peers before disclosing to a parent or trusted adult, who can then help the child report to a person of authority. Key developmental patterns in CSA disclosure were identified, whereby older children and adolescents are significantly more likely to turn to peers, keeping the abuse largely hidden from adults. Gender differences were also found, whereby girls are more likely to seek emotional support by disclosing to peers, whereas boys are significantly less likely to disclose the abuse all together; when boys do disclose, they tend to do so for practical reasons, such as protection or accessing services. This review contributes to our understanding of the various pathways of CSA disclosure and highlights the importance of further understanding youth-directed disclosures and how the reactions of informal recipients of disclosures may impact further disclosures to authorities and professionals. Research and clinical implications of the findings are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104192

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 91 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. *Alonzo-Proulx, 2017, Treatment of child sexual abuse complaints in the Quebecois criminal justice system, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 59, 397

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Manay, N., & Collin-Vézina, D.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
116
Issue
Pt 1
Pages
104192
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104192
OpenAlex
W2977099748
Semantic Scholar
894623c6cd5a9213fc2528a3a8f2f7b2aabc7717
Cited by
100
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, disclosure recipients, peer disclosure, gender differences, developmental differences, barriers to reporting
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Male, Self Disclosure, Sex Factors, Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review