Cited by 18Child Abuse and TraumaLegal and Social Justice StudiesSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

‘If my parents find out, I will not see my phone anymore’: Who do children choose to disclose online sexual solicitation to?

Open access
Gemara, Netanel, Mishna, Faye, Katz, Carmit·2025·Child & Family Social Work

Abstract

Child online sexual solicitation has become a significant form of child sexual abuse. Disclosure of online sexual solicitation is a multifaceted and complex process. The role of the disclosure recipient is crucial in the disclosure process, with respect to the initiation of the disclosure, how much children disclose, recantations and the children's well‐being. The current study aimed to explore children's experiences, perceptions, challenges and obstacles regarding disclosing online sexual solicitation as revealed in their forensic interviews. The sample, obtained from the Service of Forensic Interviews with Children in Israel, included 32 Israeli children who were sexually solicited online and participated in forensic interviews. A thematic qualitative methodology was used to analyse the children's narratives. The findings demonstrated that children tend to disclose online sexual solicitation to their peers and not to their parents. The children provided three main reasons for this tendency: sexuality, technology and the recipient's response. The current study's findings highlight the important role of peers in the disclosure process of online sexual solicitation. Moreover, the findings reveal children's difficulties disclosing online sexual solicitation to their parents. Practical implications of children's online sexual solicitation disclosure, future recommendations and study limitations are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cfs.13069

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research on online sexual solicitation indicates greater fear of adverse reactions from adults than peers.

    “By contrast, previous research on online sexual solicitation indicates greater fear of adverse reactions from adults than peers (Gemara et al., 2025).”

    From Why They Speak Up (or Don’t): Reasons For and Against Cybergrooming Disclosure Among Adolescent Victims (2025) · cites this paper as Gemara et al., 2025

    In §3.2.3 (page unavailable), children anticipated negative reactions from parents but support from peers. That supports the comparison for parents, but the claim broadens it to adults generally; the cited passage does not establish the same comparison for other adults. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Victims of sexual solicitation prefer peer disclosure as they perceived their parents to be unfamiliar with experiences of online sexual abuse.

    “This aligns with research findings on victims of sexual solicitation preferring peer disclosure as they perceived their parents to be unfamiliar with experiences of online sexual abuse (Gemara et al., 2025).”
  • Victims have reported fears of Internet restrictions, parental interference, and confiscation of devices as a barrier to disclosure in the context of cyberbullying and online sexual solicitation.

    “Victims have reported fears of this kind of punishment as a barrier to disclosure, for example, in the context of cyberbullying (Mishna et al., 2009) and online sexual solicitation (Gemara et al., 2025).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). The qualitative posture: Indwelling. In P. S. Maykut (Ed.), Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic and Practical Guide (pp. 25-40). Falmer.
  2. Spehar, C. (2015). Playful pathways to a resilient mindset: A play journey to triumph over adversity. In D. A. Crenshaw, R. Brooks, & S. Goldstein (Eds.), Play Therapy Interventions to Enhance Resilience (pp. 218-244). The Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gemara, N., Mishna, F., & Katz, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Gemara, Netanel
Venue
Child & Family Social Work
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-08-07
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
4-14
ISSN
  • 1356-7500 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2206
OpenAlex
W4385623904
Cited by
18
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child & Family Social Work (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Haruv Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
online sexual solicitation, child sexual abuse, disclosure, disclosure recipients, peer disclosure, children's perceptions, barriers to disclosure, child well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review