Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 578

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 223 of the 223 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Child maltreatment and depression: A meta-analysis of studies using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire

Open access
Humphreys, Kathryn L., LeMoult, Joelle, Wear, John G., Piersiak, Hannah A., Lee, Aaron, Gotlib, Ian H.·2020·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Background Researchers have documented that child maltreatment is associated with adverse long-term consequences for mental health, including increased risk for depression. Attempts to conduct meta-analyses of the association between different forms of child maltreatment and depressive symptomatology in adulthood, however, have been limited by the wide range of definitions of child maltreatment in the literature. Objective We sought to meta-analyze a single, widely-used dimensional measure of child maltreatment, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, with respect to depression diagnosis and symptom scores. Participants and Setting: 192 unique samples consisting of 68,830 individuals. Methods We explored the association between total scores and scores from specific forms of child maltreatment (i.e., emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and physical neglect) and depression using a random-effects meta-analysis. Results We found that higher child maltreatment scores were associated with a diagnosis of depression (g=1.07; 95% CI, 0.95−1.19) and with higher depression symptom scores (Z=.35; 95% CI, .32−.38). Moreover, although each type of child maltreatment was positively associated with depression diagnosis and scores, there was variability in the size of the effects, with emotional abuse and emotional neglect demonstrating the strongest associations. Conclusions These analyses provide important evidence of the link between child maltreatment and depression, and highlight the particularly larger association with emotional maltreatment in childhood.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104361

Cites

223 of 223 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 223 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Day, 2013, Potential mediators between child abuse and both violence and victimization in juvenile offenders, Psychological services, 10, 1, 10.1037/a0028057 · doi:10.1037/a0028057
  2. Rose, 1992, Developmental predictors of depressive cognitive styles, Developmental Perspectives on Depression, 323

Cited by

See all 578

Metadata

Authors
Humphreys, K. L., LeMoult, J., Wear, J. G., Piersiak, H. A., Lee, A., & Gotlib, I. H.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
102
Pages
104361
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005921704
Cited by
578
References
223
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • Canadian HIV Trials Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation
  • Jacobs Foundation
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Child maltreatment and depression: A meta-analysis of studies using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104361
The paper
Humphreys, K. L., LeMoult, J., Wear, J. G., Piersiak, H. A., Lee, A., & Gotlib, I. H. (2020). Child maltreatment and depression: A meta-analysis of studies using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse & Neglect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104361

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.