Cited by 48Child Abuse and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The impact of childhood maltreatment on the severity of childhood-related posttraumatic stress disorder in adults

Open access
Rameckers, Sophie A., van Emmerik, Arnold A.P., Bachrach, Nathan, Lee, Christopher W., Morina, Nexhmedin, Arntz, Arnoud·2021·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Childhood maltreatment is relatively common and is related to a range of negative consequences, such as Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). There are indications that various maltreatment types are related to PTSD severity, although not all types, such as emotional abuse, meet the PTSD Criterion-A. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between 5 types of childhood maltreatment (i.e., sexual, physical, and emotional abuse, and physical and emotional neglect) and the severity of adult PTSD and PTSD symptoms. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Adult participants (N = 147) with Childhood-related PTSD (Ch-PTSD) recruited from clinical sites completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-short form (CTQ-sf) and 2 PTSD measures: The Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). METHODS: Childhood maltreatment predictors and 2 covariates, age and gender, were analysed in multivariate multilevel models as participants were nested within sites. A model selection procedure, in which all combinations of predictors were examined, was used to select a final set of predictors. RESULTS: The results indicated that emotional abuse was the only trauma type that was significantly related to severity of PTSD and to the severity of specific PTSD symptom clusters (r between 0.130 and 0.338). The final models explained between 6.5% and 16.7% of the variance in PTSD severity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that emotional abuse plays a more important role in Ch-PTSD than hitherto assumed, and that treatment should not neglect processing of childhood emotional abuse.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105208

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many adverse childhood experiences are often neglected even when there is a diagnosis of PTSD.

    “This is important because sadly, many adverse childhood experiences are often neglected even when there is a diagnosis of PTSD (69).”

    From Timing of imagery rescripting during schema therapy for borderline personality disorder: the LUCY trial (2023) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Discussion says childhood emotional abuse often goes unnoticed and recommends giving memories of it more attention during PTSD screening, assessment, and treatment. That supports the concern for emotional abuse, but the paper does not say that many kinds of adverse childhood experience are often neglected even after a PTSD diagnosis. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rameckers, S. A., van Emmerik, A. A. P., Bachrach, N., Lee, C. W., Morina, N., & Arntz, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Rameckers, Sophie A.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
120
Pages
105208
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3183393392
Cited by
48
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
child abuse, PTSD symptom severity, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, physical neglect, emotional neglect, PTSD symptom clusters, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, CAPS-5, PCL-5
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review