Cited by 20Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesChild Abuse and TraumaMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Psychological maltreatment, meaning-centered coping, psychological flexibility, and suicide cognitions: A moderated mediation model

Türk, Nuri, Arslan, Gökmen, Kaya, Alican, Güç, Ebru, Turan, Mehmet Emin·2024·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Background Mental health problems are currently diversifying, increasing the possibility of suicide. Exposure to psychological maltreatment is one of the factors that increases suicidal cognitions. In addition, psychological flexibility and meaning-centered approaches may be effective in coping with suicidal cognitions. Objective A hypothesized model was tested to examine the relationships among psychological maltreatment, suicidal cognitions, psychological flexibility, and meaning-centered coping. Method Data were collected from a sample of 652 participants. Mediation and moderation analyses were conducted to examine the mediating and moderating role of psychological flexibility and meaning-centered coping in the relationship between childhood psychological maltreatment and suicide cognitions among Turkish adults. Results The results of the study indicated significant negative and positive relationships between psychological maltreatment, suicide cognitions, psychological flexibility, and meaning-centered coping. The findings suggest that psychological flexibility and meaning-centered coping have a serial mediating effect on the relationship between psychological maltreatment and suicide cognitions. Furthermore, according to the study results, psychological flexibility plays a moderating role both between psychological maltreatment and suicidal cognitions and between meaning-centered coping and suicidal cognitions. Conclusions The study suggests that psychological maltreatme…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106735

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Türk, N., Arslan, G., Kaya, A., Güç, E., & Turan, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Siirt Üniversitesi (TR)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University (TR)
Corresponding author
Arslan, Gökmen
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
152
Pages
106735
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393855478
Cited by
20
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
childhood emotional abuse, suicidal cognitions, psychological flexibility, suicide prevention, serial mediation, moderation, protective factors, risk factors, Turkish adults
MeSH terms
Mediation Analysis, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Suicide, Turkey, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review