Cited by 21Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessMobile Health and mHealth Applications

‘Reach Out, Rise Up’: the efficacy of text messaging in an intervention package for anxiety and depression severity in young people

Anstiss, David, Davies, Amber·2015·Children and Youth Services Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.09.011

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anstiss, D., & Davies, A.
Corresponding author
Anstiss, David
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
58
Pages
99-103
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1890289436
Cited by
21
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
text messaging, digital mental health interventions, adolescent depression, youth anxiety, symptom severity, peer support, family support, youth mental health, intervention efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review