CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 195Children's Rights and ParticipationYouth Development and Social SupportParticipatory Visual Research Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Re-conceptualising youth participation: A framework to inform action

Open access
Cahill, Helen, Dadvand, Babak·2018·Children and Youth Services Review
DOI 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

To date, various participation models have been proposed to assist those who want to involve young people in program design, delivery and evaluation. These models tend to classify participatory practices, and often use hierarchical structures which do not account well for the socio-cultural contexts in which participation takes place. In this paper, we draw upon scholarship in the fields of feminist, post-structural and critical theory, as well as youth studies, and citizenship research to propose a new framework for conceptualising and planning for youth participation in programs. The framework directs attention towards the seven inter-connected domains of purpose, positioning, perspective, power relations, protection, place and process. To illustrate the framework, we draw on our experience of two youth projects which address HIV prevention in countries within the Asia-Pacific region. We demonstrate how using the framework helped to strengthen the vision, quality and impact of the programs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.001

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. United Nations, 1989, 3, 1577

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–194 of 194

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cahill, H., & Dadvand, B.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Dadvand, Babak
ORCID
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
95
Pages
243-253
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.001
OpenAlex
W2899338235
Cited by
195
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6
FWCI
18.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
Keywords
youth participation, participatory approach, power relations, youth voice, youth protection, youth citizenship, HIV prevention programs, Asia-Pacific region, feminist theory, poststructuralism, critical theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review