Cited by 79Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesBone health and osteoporosis researchBone Metabolism and Diseases

Pérdida de masa ósea tras gastrectomía tubular: estudio prospectivo comparativo con el bypass gástrico

Nogués, Xavier, Goday, Albert, Peña, Maria Jesus, Benaiges, David, de Ramón, Marta, Crous, Xenia, Vial, Manuel, Pera, Manuel +3 more·2010·Cirugía Española

Abstract

Introduction Bariatric surgery is the most effective option for the treatment of patients with a high risk of complications due to their obesity. However, it brings about a series of changes in calcium and vitamin D metabolism and an increase in resorption which lead to a loss of bone mass.Aim The objective of this study is to compare sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as regards loss of bone mass using bone densitometry and bone remodelling markers.Patients and methods Fifteen women with morbid obesity were included, 8 by SG and 7 by RYGB, with a mean age of 47.8+/-9 and mean body mass index 43.3+/-3.4. Bone mass measurements were made on the lumbar spine, femur and distal radius, and the bone remodelling markers N-telopeptide (NTx) and bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP), as well as vitamin D levels before and 12 months after surgery.Results A significant bone mass loss was observed was observed with SG and RYGB, in the lumbar spine and hip, whilst no differences were observed in the radial. The percentage bone mass loss was less in the column and femur after SG than with RYGB, although it did not reach statistical significance, 4.6%+/-4.4 (mean+/-SD) and 6.3%+/-5.4 (mean+/-SD), respectively. At 12 months the Ntx increased for both types of surgery, and the BAP was only increased for SG.Conclusion SG causes less, although not significant, bone mass loss compared to RYGB.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.04.008

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bone loss has been reported as early as 6 months after sleeve gastrectomy, with total hip -5.2%, femoral neck -7.0%, and a small lumbar spine decrease.

    “Bone loss has been reported as early as 6 months after SG (TH :-5.2% and FN :-7.0%, with had a small decrease at the LS)51.”
  • A strong association between extent of weight loss after bariatric surgery and amount of bone loss has been documented by most but not all studies.

    “A strong association between extent of weight loss after bariatric surgery and amount of bone loss has been documented bymost40, 45, 51-53, 62, 67 but not all studies.63”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nogués, X., Goday, A., Peña, M. J., Benaiges, D., de Ramón, M., Crous, X., Vial, M., Pera, M., Grande, L., Díez-Pérez, A., & Ramón, J. M.
Affiliations
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
Cirugía Española
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
103-109
ISSN
0009-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061039716
Cited by
79
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
closed
Locations
Cirugía Española (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
bone loss, sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, bariatric surgery, morbid obesity, bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, N-telopeptide, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, vitamin D, calcium metabolism, bone resorption, lumbar spine, femur, women, postoperative complications, metabolic bone disease, osteoporosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review