Cited by 40Physical Activity and HealthCardiac Health and Mental HealthMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Results of the Sedentary Intervention Trial in Cardiac Rehabilitation (SIT-CR Study): A pilot randomized controlled trial

Prince, Stephanie A., Reed, Jennifer L., Cotie, Lisa M., Harris, Jennifer, Pipe, Andrew L., Reid, Robert D.·2018·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Sedentary time (ST) is negatively associated with cardiometabolic health and fitness. Traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programming may not significantly reduce ST. The objectives of the study were to assess the feasibility and practicality of activPAL devices for measuring ST in CR, and whether prompting cues to interrupt sedentary behaviour can decrease ST and improve clinical outcomes.Methods An 8-week, two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial allocated coronary artery disease patients to either a control (usual care CR) or intervention (CR + sedentary prompts from an activPAL3-VT) group. Primary outcomes included: recruitment; acceptability; completion; and, adherence rates. Secondary outcomes included changes in: ST; physical activity (PA); cardiometabolic health; psychosocial health; and, fitness.Results Forty participants (16 females; 19 intervention; 62 ± 10 years) were randomized. Outcome data were available for 95% of participants. All but one participant completed the full intervention. Most (73%) intervention participants felt the prompts had somewhat changed their sedentary behaviour. At baseline, participants spent 47% of their day sedentary. No significant group differences in changes for any of the ST, PA or fitness outcomes were observed. The mean group difference for post-intervention ST (controlling for baseline) was 30.3 min/day (95% CI: -51.7, 112.2) in favour of the intervention. The intervention group reported significantly better physical health and had a lower ratio of total cholesterol-to-high density lipoprotein when compared to controls.Conclusions It is feasible to use activPAL devices to measure ST in a CR setting. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of multi-component sedentary behaviour interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.082

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prince, S. A., Reed, J. L., Cotie, L. M., Harris, J., Pipe, A. L., & Reid, R. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Ottawa Heart Institute (CA)
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
269
Pages
317-324
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883117634
Cited by
40
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Ottawa
  • University of Ottawa Heart Institute Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
sedentary behavior, cardiac rehabilitation, coronary artery disease, physical activity, cardiometabolic health, feasibility, TC/HDL-C ratio, psychosocial health, exercise adherence
MeSH terms
Cardiac Rehabilitation, Aged, Coronary Artery Disease, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Exercise, Sedentary Behavior, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review