Cited by 33Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingBlood transfusion and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of vigorous mixing of blood vacuum tubes on laboratory test results

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effect of tubes mixing (gentle vs. vigorous) on diagnostic blood specimens collected in vacuum tube systems by venipuncture. Design and methods Blood was collected for routine coagulation, immunochemistry and hematological testing from one hundred volunteers into six vacuum tubes: two 3.6 mL vacuum tubes containing 0.4 mL of buffered sodium citrate (9NC) 0.109 mol/L: 3.2 W/V%; two 3.5 mL vacuum tubes with clot activator and gel separator; and two 3.0 mL vacuum tubes containing 5.9 mg K(2)EDTA (Terumo Europe, Belgium). Immediately after the venipuncture all vacuum tubes (each of one additive type) were processed through two different procedures: i) Standard: blood specimens in K(2)EDTA- or sodium citrate-vacuum tubes were gently inverted five times whereas the specimens in tubes with clot activator and gel separator were gently inverted ten times, as recommended by the manufacturer; ii) Vigorous mix: all blood specimens were shaken up vigorously during 3-5s independently of the additive type inside the tubes. The significance of the differences between samples was assessed by Student's t-test or Wilcoxon ranked-pairs test after checking for normality. The level of statistical significance was set at P Results No significant difference (P Conclusion Our results drop out a paradigm suggesting that the incorrect primary blood tubes mixing promotes laboratory variability. We suggest that similar evaluation should be done using other brands of vacuum tubes…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.10.033

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Avoiding vigorous mixing of specimens prevents blood cell injury, hemolysis, platelet activation or blood clotting.

    “Avoid vigorous mixing of the specimens (e.g. shaking) to prevent blood cell injury, hemolysis, platelet activation or blood clotting [87].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Carraro, 2012, Exploring the initial steps of the testing process: frequency and nature of pre-preanalytic errors, Clin Chem, 58, 638, 10.1373/clinchem.2011.175711 · DOI
  2. Carraro, 2007, Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later, Clin Chem, 53, 1338, 10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344 · DOI
  3. Plebani, 2007, Laboratory errors: how to improve pre- and post-analytical phases?, Biochem Med (Zagreb), 17, 5, 10.11613/BM.2007.001 · DOI
  4. Plebani, 1997, Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency, Clin Chem, 43, 1348, 10.1093/clinchem/43.8.1348 · DOI
  5. Lippi, 2010, Influence of a light meal on routine haematological tests, Blood Transfus, 8, 94
  6. Lima-Oliveira, 2012, Influence of a regular, standardized meal on clinical chemistry analytes, Ann Lab Med, 32, 250, 10.3343/alm.2012.32.4.250 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gren, 2009, Incorrect guidelines for venipuncture affect the analytical results, Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 69, 815, 10.3109/00365510903307970 · DOI
  8. Lima-Oliveira, 2011, Transillumination: a new tool to eliminate the impact of venous stasis during the procedure for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens for routine haematological testing, Int J Lab Hematol, 33, 457, 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2011.01305.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lippi, 2005, Influence of short-term venous stasis on clinical chemistry testing, Clin Chem Lab Med, 43, 869, 10.1515/CCLM.2005.146 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Lippi, 2006, Venous stasis and routine hematologic testing, Clin Lab Haematol, 28, 332, 10.1111/j.1365-2257.2006.00818.x · DOI
  11. Lima-Oliveira, 2011, New ways to deal with known preanalytical issues: use of transilluminator instead of tourniquet for easing vein access and eliminating stasis on clinical biochemistry, Biochem Med, 21, 152, 10.11613/BM.2011.024 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Loh, 2011, Impact of phlebotomy decision support application on sample collection errors and laboratory efficiency, Clin Chim Acta, 412, 393, 10.1016/j.cca.2010.10.022 · DOI
  13. Gosselin, 2004, Comparison of samples obtained from 3.2% sodium citrate glass and two 3.2% sodium citrate plastic blood collection tubes used in coagulation testing, Am J Clin Pathol, 122, 843, 10.1309/7V2KP1HP9Q29BMN2 · DOI
  14. Kratz, 2006, A comparison of glass and plastic blood collection tubes for routine and specialized coagulation assays: a comprehensive study, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 130, 39, 10.5858/2006-130-39-ACOGAP · DOI
  15. Lippi, 2005, Influence of two different buffered sodium citrate concentrations on coagulation testing, Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis, 16, 381, 10.1097/01.mbc.0000172097.15458.c5 · DOI
  16. Stankovic, 2010, Total quality in laboratory diagnostics: the role of commercial companies, Biochem Med, 20, 207, 10.11613/BM.2010.025 · DOI
  17. Parenmark, 2011, To mix or not to mix venous blood samples collected in vacuum tubes?, Clin Chem Lab Med, 49, 2061, 10.1515/CCLM.2011.705 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Milos, 2009, Evaluation and performance characteristics of the coagulation system: ACL TOP analyzer — HemosIL reagents, Int J Lab Hematol, 31, 26, 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.00999.x · DOI
  19. Ricos, 1999, Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress, Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 59, 491, 10.1080/00365519950185229 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Bowen, 2010, Impact of blood collection devices on clinical chemistry assays, Clin Biochem, 43, 4, 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.10.001 · DOI
  21. Lima-Oliveira, 2012, Impact of the phlebotomy training based on CLSI/NCCLS H03–A6 - procedures for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture, Biochem Med (Zagreb), 22, 342, 10.11613/BM.2012.036 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Simundic, 2010, Hemolysis detection and management of hemolyzed specimens, Biochem Med, 20, 154, 10.11613/BM.2010.018 · DOI
  23. Lima-Oliveira, 2012, Different manufacturers of syringes: a new source of variability in blood gas, acid–base balance and related laboratory test?, Clin Biochem, 45, 683, 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.03.007 · DOI
  24. Lima-Oliveira, 2012, Pre analytical management: serum vaccum tubes validation for routine clinical chemistry, Biochem Med (Zagreb), 22, 180, 10.11613/BM.2012.021 · DOI
  25. Lippi, 2011, Suitability of a transport box for blood sample shipment over a long period, Clin Biochem, 44, 1028, 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.05.028 · DOI
  26. Lippi, 2012, Primary blood tubes mixing: time for updated recommendations, Clin Chem Lab Med, 50, 599, 10.1515/cclm-2012-0120 · DOI
  27. Lippi, 2012, Quality standards for sample collection in coagulation testing, Semin Thromb Hemost, 38, 565, 10.1055/s-0032-1315961 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lima-Oliveira, G., Lippi, G., Salvagno, G. L., Montagnana, M., Gelati, M., Volanski, W., Boritiza, K. C., Picheth, G., & Guidi, G. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Corresponding author
Lima-Oliveira, Gabriel
Venue
Clinical Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
250-254
ISSN
0009-9120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085972486
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood transfusion and management
Keywords
blood collection tubes, anticoagulants, sodium citrate, EDTA, coagulation tests, hematology testing, immunochemistry, foaming
MeSH terms
Sodium Citrate, Adult, Alkaline Phosphatase, Blood Glucose, Blood Specimen Collection, Buffers, Centrifugation, Citrates, Edetic Acid, Female, Humans, Immunochemistry, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Male, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Statistics, Nonparametric, Phlebotomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review