Cited by 132Neurological disorders and treatmentsBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Quality of life in patients with focal dystonia

Pekmezovic, Tatjana, Svetel, Marina, Ivanovic, Natasa, Dragasevic, Natasa, Petrovic, Igor, Tepavcevic, Darija Kisic, Kostic, Vladimir S.·2009·Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

Abstract

Objectives The aims of this study were to identify the clinical and demographic factors influencing health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and to compare HR-QoL measures between various types of focal dystonia (cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and writer's cramp).Methods We examined 157 consecutive patients with adult-onset primary focal dystonia, and HR-QoL was assessed by using the SF-36 questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.Results Patients with writer's cramp scored better in all SF-36 domains, except role functioning physical (RP), while these differences were statistically significant for physical functioning (PF) (p=0.020), bodily pain (BP) (p=0.001), and general health (GH) (p=0.004). Patients with writer's cramp and blepharospasm scored significantly better for BP (p=0.001) than patients with cervical dystonia. We found that each of the eight dimensions of SF-36 proved to be significantly correlated to the Hamilton depression rating scale score in patients with torticollis and blepharospasm, while vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), and mental health (MH) scales showed statistically significant correlations in patients with hand dystonia. Similar relationships were observed between anxiety and SF-36 domains.Conclusion Depression and anxiety are the most important predictors of poorer HR-QoL in patients with all three types of focal dystonia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.09.023

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pekmezovic, T., Svetel, M., Ivanovic, N., Dragasevic, N., Petrovic, I., Tepavcevic, D. K., & Kostic, V. S.
Affiliations
Univerzitetski Klinički Centar Srbije (RS)
Venue
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
161-164
ISSN
0303-8467 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011528262
Cited by
132
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Science and Engineering Research Board
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
focal dystonia, health-related quality of life, cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, writer's cramp, SF-36, depression, anxiety, bodily pain, physical function, hand dystonia, torticollis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blepharospasm, Depression, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Pain, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Severity of Illness Index, Social Adjustment, Torticollis, Dystonic Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review