The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oromucosal Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol/cannabidiol for neuropathic pain associated with multiple sclerosis: An uncontrolled, open-label, 2-year extension trial
Abstract
Background Central neuropathic pain (CNP), pain initiated or caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction of the central nervous system, occurs in ~28% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol/cannabidiol (THC/CBD), an endocannabinoid system modulator, has demonstrated efficacy for up to 4 weeks in randomized controlled trials in the treatment of CNP in patients with MS.Objective The purpose of this extension was to establish long-term tolerability and effectiveness profiles for THC/CBD (Sativex (R), GW Pharmaceuticals plc, Salisbury, United Kingdom) oromucosal spray in CNP associated with MS.Methods This uncontrolled, open-label trial was an indefinite-duration extension of a previously reported 5-week randomized study in patients with MS and CNP. In the initial trial, patients were randomized to placebo or THC/CBD. Patients were only required to maintain their existing analgesia in the randomized study. In the open-label trial they could vary their other analgesia as required. All patients (placebo and THC/CBD) who completed the randomized trial commenced the open-label follow-up on THC/CBD (27 mg/mL: 25 mg/mL). Patients titrated their dosage, maintaining their existing analgesia. The primary end point of the trial was the number, frequency, and type of adverse events (AEs) reported by patients. Secondary end points included changes from baseline in 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11) neuropathic pain score, hematology and clinical chemistry test results, vital signs, trial drug usage, and intoxication visual analogue scale scores.Results Sixty-six patients were enrolled in the randomized trial; 64 (97%) completed the randomized trial and 63 (95%) entered the open-label extension (race, white, 100%; sex, male, 14 [22%]; mean [SD] age, 49 [8.4] years [range, 27-71 years[). The mean (SD) duration of open-label treatment was 463 (378) days (median, 638 days; range, 3-917 days), with 34 (54%) patients completing >1 year of treatment with THC/CBD and 28 (44%) patients completing the open-label trial with a mean (SD) duration of treatment of 839 (42) days (median, 845 days; range, 701-917 days). Mean NRS-11 pain scores in the final week of the randomized trial were 3.8 in the treatment group and 5.0 in the placebo group. In the 28 (44%) patients who completed the 2-year follow up, the mean (SD) NRS-11 pain score in the final week of treatment was 2.9 (2.0) (range, 0-8.0). Fifty-eight (92%) patients experienced > or =1 treatment-related AE. These AEs were rated by the investigator as mild in 47 (75%) patients, moderate in 49 (78%), and severe in 32 (51%). The most commonly reported AEs were dizziness (27%), nausea (18 %), and feeling intoxicated (11%). Two treatment-related serious AEs (ventricular bigeminy and circulatory collapse) were judged to be treatment-related. Both serious AEs occurred in the same patient and resolved completely following a period of discontinuation. Eleven (17%) patients experienced oral discomfort, 4 persistently. Regular oral examinations revealed that 7 (11%) patients developed white buccal mucosal patches and 2 (3%) developed red buccal mucosal patches; all cases were deemed mild and resolved. Seventeen (25%) patients withdrew due to AEs. The mean number of sprays and patients experiencing intoxication remained stable throughout the follow-up trial.Conclusions THC/CBD was effective, with no evidence of tolerance, in these select patients with CNP and MS who completed approximately 2 years of treatment (n = 28). Ninety-two percent of patients experienced an AE, the most common of which were dizziness and nausea. The majority of AEs were deemed to be of mild to moderate severity by the investigators.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ninety-five percent of the patients in the placebo-controlled study chose to enter a two year open-label study with Sativex®.147”
From Cannabinoids as Pharmacotherapies for Neuropathic Pain: From the Bench to the Bedside (2009) · cites this paper as [147]
In the citing paper
“Most doses of Sativex® were administered between 6 PM and 12 AM demonstrating that pain symptoms may be at their worst during normal sleeping hours for MS patients.”
From Cannabinoids as Pharmacotherapies for Neuropathic Pain: From the Bench to the Bedside (2009) · cites this paper as [147]
In the citing paper
“Twenty-five percent withdrew due to adverse events and 95% experienced one or more adverse events during the course of treatment.”
From Cannabinoids as Pharmacotherapies for Neuropathic Pain: From the Bench to the Bedside (2009) · cites this paper as [147]
In the citing paper
“Fifty-four percent of the patients completed one year and 44% of patients completed two years of the study.”
From Cannabinoids as Pharmacotherapies for Neuropathic Pain: From the Bench to the Bedside (2009) · cites this paper as [147]
In the citing paper
“The NRS-11, completed at the end of the trial or upon withdrawal, was not different from the earlier randomized study indicating that Sativex® was still suppressing pain.”
From Cannabinoids as Pharmacotherapies for Neuropathic Pain: From the Bench to the Bedside (2009) · cites this paper as [147]
In the citing paper
“Additionally, patients did not increase the titration of their dose indicating that no tolerance developed to Sativex®.”
From Cannabinoids as Pharmacotherapies for Neuropathic Pain: From the Bench to the Bedside (2009) · cites this paper as [147]
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols
Poser, C. M., Paty, D. W., Scheinberg, L., McDonald, W. I., Davis, F. A., Ebers, G. C., Johnson, K. P., Sibley, W. A., Silberberg, D. H., & Tourtellotte, W. W. (1983) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410130302 · Cited by 7,384
Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms
Merskey, H. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,362
The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods
Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver, S. (1986) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9 · Cited by 3,275
Available, N. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.23.3043 · Cited by 2,344
Bačkonja, M. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.21.1831 · Cited by 1,529
Gabapentin for the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia A Randomized Controlled Trial
Rowbotham, M. C. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.21.1837 · Cited by 1,418
Algorithm for neuropathic pain treatment: An evidence based proposal
Finnerup, N. B., Otto, M., McQuay, H. J., Jensen, T. S., & Sindrup, S. H. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.013 · Cited by 1,337
EFNS guidelines on pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain
Attal, N., Cruccu, G., Haanpää, M. L., Hansson, P. T., Jensen, T. S., Nurmikko, T. J., Sampaio, C., Sindrup, S. H., & Wiffen, P. J. (2006) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01511.x · Cited by 877
Development and preliminary validation of a pain measure specific to neuropathic pain
Galer, B. S., & Jensen, M. (1997) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.48.2.332 · Cited by 778
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision
Attal, N., Cruccu, G., Baron, R., Haanpää, M., Hansson, P., Jensen, T. S., & Nurmikko, T. (2010) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02999.x · Cited by 1,873
“Adverse events (dizziness, dry mouth, sedation, fatigue, gastrointestinal effects, oral discomfort) were reported by 90% of patients in longterm extension study (up to 3 years), but no tolerance was observed [74].”
BackgroundSelf-citationJohnson, J. R., Burnell-Nugent, M., Lossignol, D., Ganae-Motan, E. D., Potts, R., & Fallon, M. T. (2010) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.008 · Cited by 622
Ligresti, A., PETROCELLIS, L. D., & Marzo, V. D. (2016) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00002.2016 · Cited by 505
“Apart from MS spasticity (263), Sativex is effective against neuropathic pain in MS patients, with no evidence of tolerance up to 2 yr of treatment (739).”
BackgroundThe Pharmacologic and Clinical Effects of Medical Cannabis
Borgelt, L. M., Franson, K. L., Nussbaum, A. M., & Wang, G. S. (2013) · Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.1187 · Cited by 423
Cannabinoids and Pain: New Insights From Old Molecules
Vučković, S., Srebro, D., Vujović, K. S., Vučetić, Č., & Prostran, M. S. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01259 · Cited by 440
“The safety and tolerability of nabiximols long-term use in different conditions (cancer pain, spasticity and neuropathic pain in MS patients) has been studied in a series of trials of up to 2 years duration (Wade et al., 2006; Rog et al., 2007; Johnson et al., 2013; Serpell et al., 2013).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- ROG, D., NURMIKKO, T., & YOUNG, C.
- Affiliations
- Walton Centre (GB)
- Venue
- Clinical Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2068-2079
- ISSN
- 0149-2918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996712837
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bayer Corporation
- GW Pharmaceuticals
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Keywords
- central pain, multiple sclerosis, oromucosal spray, Sativex, long-term tolerability, adverse events, endocannabinoid system, pain management, cannabis-based medicines, poisoning, analgesia, vital signs, drug use, open-label extension
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Administration, Sublingual, Adult, Aerosols, Analgesics, Opioid, Cannabidiol, Central Nervous System Diseases, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth Mucosa, Multiple Sclerosis, Pain, Plant Extracts, Dronabinol
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review