Cited by 187Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Oromucosal Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol/cannabidiol for neuropathic pain associated with multiple sclerosis: An uncontrolled, open-label, 2-year extension trial

ROG, D, NURMIKKO, T, YOUNG, C·2007·Clinical Therapeutics

Abstract

Background Central neuropathic pain (CNP), pain initiated or caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction of the central nervous system, occurs in ~28% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol/cannabidiol (THC/CBD), an endocannabinoid system modulator, has demonstrated efficacy for up to 4 weeks in randomized controlled trials in the treatment of CNP in patients with MS.Objective The purpose of this extension was to establish long-term tolerability and effectiveness profiles for THC/CBD (Sativex (R), GW Pharmaceuticals plc, Salisbury, United Kingdom) oromucosal spray in CNP associated with MS.Methods This uncontrolled, open-label trial was an indefinite-duration extension of a previously reported 5-week randomized study in patients with MS and CNP. In the initial trial, patients were randomized to placebo or THC/CBD. Patients were only required to maintain their existing analgesia in the randomized study. In the open-label trial they could vary their other analgesia as required. All patients (placebo and THC/CBD) who completed the randomized trial commenced the open-label follow-up on THC/CBD (27 mg/mL: 25 mg/mL). Patients titrated their dosage, maintaining their existing analgesia. The primary end point of the trial was the number, frequency, and type of adverse events (AEs) reported by patients. Secondary end points included changes from baseline in 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11) neuropathic pain score, hematology and clinical chemistry test results, vital signs, trial drug usage, and intoxication visual analogue scale scores.Results Sixty-six patients were enrolled in the randomized trial; 64 (97%) completed the randomized trial and 63 (95%) entered the open-label extension (race, white, 100%; sex, male, 14 [22%]; mean [SD] age, 49 [8.4] years [range, 27-71 years[). The mean (SD) duration of open-label treatment was 463 (378) days (median, 638 days; range, 3-917 days), with 34 (54%) patients completing >1 year of treatment with THC/CBD and 28 (44%) patients completing the open-label trial with a mean (SD) duration of treatment of 839 (42) days (median, 845 days; range, 701-917 days). Mean NRS-11 pain scores in the final week of the randomized trial were 3.8 in the treatment group and 5.0 in the placebo group. In the 28 (44%) patients who completed the 2-year follow up, the mean (SD) NRS-11 pain score in the final week of treatment was 2.9 (2.0) (range, 0-8.0). Fifty-eight (92%) patients experienced > or =1 treatment-related AE. These AEs were rated by the investigator as mild in 47 (75%) patients, moderate in 49 (78%), and severe in 32 (51%). The most commonly reported AEs were dizziness (27%), nausea (18 %), and feeling intoxicated (11%). Two treatment-related serious AEs (ventricular bigeminy and circulatory collapse) were judged to be treatment-related. Both serious AEs occurred in the same patient and resolved completely following a period of discontinuation. Eleven (17%) patients experienced oral discomfort, 4 persistently. Regular oral examinations revealed that 7 (11%) patients developed white buccal mucosal patches and 2 (3%) developed red buccal mucosal patches; all cases were deemed mild and resolved. Seventeen (25%) patients withdrew due to AEs. The mean number of sprays and patients experiencing intoxication remained stable throughout the follow-up trial.Conclusions THC/CBD was effective, with no evidence of tolerance, in these select patients with CNP and MS who completed approximately 2 years of treatment (n = 28). Ninety-two percent of patients experienced an AE, the most common of which were dizziness and nausea. The majority of AEs were deemed to be of mild to moderate severity by the investigators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.013

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ninety-five percent of the patients in the placebo-controlled study chose to enter a two year open-label study with Sativex.

    “Ninety-five percent of the patients in the placebo-controlled study chose to enter a two year open-label study with Sativex®.147”
  • Most doses of Sativex were administered between 6 PM and 12 AM, demonstrating that pain symptoms may be at their worst during normal sleeping hours for multiple sclerosis patients.

    “Most doses of Sativex® were administered between 6 PM and 12 AM demonstrating that pain symptoms may be at their worst during normal sleeping hours for MS patients.”
  • Twenty-five percent withdrew due to adverse events and 95% experienced one or more adverse events during the course of Sativex treatment.

    “Twenty-five percent withdrew due to adverse events and 95% experienced one or more adverse events during the course of treatment.”
  • Fifty-four percent of patients completed one year and 44% completed two years of the Sativex open-label study.

    “Fifty-four percent of the patients completed one year and 44% of patients completed two years of the study.”
  • The NRS-11 completed at the end of the trial or upon withdrawal was not different from the earlier randomized study, indicating that Sativex was still suppressing pain.

    “The NRS-11, completed at the end of the trial or upon withdrawal, was not different from the earlier randomized study indicating that Sativex® was still suppressing pain.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ROG, D., NURMIKKO, T., & YOUNG, C.
Affiliations
Walton Centre (GB)
Venue
Clinical Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
2068-2079
ISSN
0149-2918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996712837
Cited by
187
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bayer Corporation
  • GW Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
central pain, multiple sclerosis, oromucosal spray, Sativex, long-term tolerability, adverse events, endocannabinoid system, pain management, cannabis-based medicines, poisoning, analgesia, vital signs, drug use, open-label extension
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Administration, Sublingual, Adult, Aerosols, Analgesics, Opioid, Cannabidiol, Central Nervous System Diseases, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth Mucosa, Multiple Sclerosis, Pain, Plant Extracts, Dronabinol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review