Cited by 622Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Management and Opioid UsePain Mechanisms and Treatments

Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of THC:CBD Extract and THC Extract in Patients with Intractable Cancer-Related Pain

Open access
Johnson, Jeremy R., Burnell-Nugent, Mary, Lossignol, Dominique, Ganae-Motan, Elena Doina, Potts, Richard, Fallon, Marie T.·2010·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of a tetrahydrocannabinol:cannabidiol (THC:CBD) extract, a nonopioid analgesic endocannabinoid system modulator, and a THC extract, with placebo, in relieving pain in patients with advanced cancer. In total, 177 patients with cancer pain, who experienced inadequate analgesia despite chronic opioid dosing, entered a two-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Patients were randomized to THC:CBD extract (n = 60), THC extract (n = 58), or placebo (n = 59). The primary analysis of change from baseline in mean pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score was statistically significantly in favor of THC:CBD compared with placebo (improvement of -1.37 vs. -0.69), whereas the THC group showed a nonsignificant change (-1.01 vs. -0.69). Twice as many patients taking THC:CBD showed a reduction of more than 30% from baseline pain NRS score when compared with placebo (23 [43%] vs. 12 [21%]). The associated odds ratio was statistically significant, whereas the number of THC group responders was similar to placebo (12 [23%] vs. 12 [21%]) and did not reach statistical significance. There was no change from baseline in median dose of opioid background medication or mean number of doses of breakthrough medication across treatment groups. No significant group differences were found in the NRS sleep quality or nausea scores or the pain control assessment. However, the results from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Questionnaire showed a worsening in nausea and vomiting with THC:CBD compared with placebo (P = 0.02), whereas THC had no difference (P = 1.0). Most drug-related adverse events were mild/moderate in severity. This study shows that THC:CBD extract is efficacious for relief of pain in patients with advanced cancer pain not fully relieved by strong opioids.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.008

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two controlled studies found no effect of cannabinoids on opioid dose requirements.

    “Two controlled studies found no effect of cannabinoids on opioid dose requirements (Johnson et al, 2010;Seeling et al, 2006).”

    From Opioid-Sparing Effect of Cannabinoids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Johnson et al, 2010

  • In Johnson 2010, there was no change in median amount of breakthrough opioid medication in any group; change in pain NRS from baseline was statistically significantly in favor of delta-9-THC:CBD compared with placebo.

    “No change in median amount of breakthrough opioid medication in any group Change in pain NRS (out of 10) from baseline was statistically significantly in favor of delta-9-THC:CBD compared with the placebo”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]7. Noyes R, Brunk SF, Avery DA, et al. The analge- sic properties of delta 9-tetrahydro-cannabinol and codeine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1975;18:84e89.
  2. [42]42. Pertwee RG. The diverse CB1 and CB2 receptor pharmacology of three plant cannabinoids: D9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and D9-tetra- hydrocannabivarin. Br J Pharmacol 2008;153: 199e215.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, J. R., Burnell-Nugent, M., Lossignol, D., Ganae-Motan, E. D., Potts, R., & Fallon, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • GW Pharmaceuticals (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Edinburgh Cancer Research (GB)
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
167-179
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006503897
Cited by
622
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Funders
GW Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, cancer pain, refractory pain, non-opioid analgesics, opioid-refractory pain, advanced cancer, analgesia, nausea and vomiting, adverse events, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cannabidiol, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Intractable Pain, Pain, Intractable, Dronabinol, Endpoint Determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review