The effects of vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control and maternal-neonatal outcomes in women with established gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background & aims Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is associated with a well-documented range of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The present meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control and maternal-neonatal outcomes in women with established GDM. Methods Published literature was retrieved and screened from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wanfang, and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trails up to May 2020. RCTs of vitamin D supplementation on pregnant women with GDM were included. Results 19 RCTs (1550 participants) were eligible for meta-analyses. Overall, vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced serum fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (MD: -10.20 mg/dL, 95%CI: -13.43 to -6.96), insulin concentration (MD: -5.02 μIU/mL, 95%CI: -6.83 to -3.20) and the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (MD:-1.06, 95%CI: -1.40 to -0.72) in women with GDM. In addition, vitamin D supplementation in pregnant women with GDM significantly reduced adverse maternal outcomes including cesarean section (RR: 0.75, 95%CI: 0.63 to 0.89), maternal hospitalization (RR: 0.13, 95%CI: 0.02 to 0.98) and postpartum hemorrhage (RR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.22 to 1.00). Several adverse neonatal complications including neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (RR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.33 to 0.67), giant children (RR: 0.58, 95%CI: 0.38 to 0.89), polyhydramnios (RR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.72), fetal distress (RR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.24 to 0.90) and premature delivery (RR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.72) were also significantly reduced. Conclusions This meta-analysis suggested that supplementation of GDM women with vitamin D may lead to an improvement in glycemic control and reduction of adverse maternal-neonatal outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vitamin D supplementation in pregnant women lowers serum fasting plasma glucose, HOMA-IR, and insulin concentration in women with GDM.
“Similarly, a meta-analysis of 19 randomised controlled trials by Wang MM et al. demonstrated that vitamin D supplementation in pregnant women lowered serum fasting plasma glucose, HOMA-IR, and insulin concentration in women with GDM [137].”
From Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [137]
Cites
Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., Chandler, J., Welch, V. A., Higgins, J. P., & Thomas, J. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.ed000142 · Cited by 7,218 · see citing works
Lee, K. W., Ching, S. M., Ramachandran, V., Yee, A., Hoo, F. K., Chia, Y. C., Wan Sulaiman, W. A., Suppiah, S., Mohamed, M. H., & Veettil, S. K. (2018) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-018-2131-4 · Cited by 546 · see citing works
Hartling, L., Dryden, D. M., Guthrie, A., Muise, M., Vandermeer, B., & Donovan, L. (2013) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-159-2-201307160-00661 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: A meta-analysis
Eades, C. E., Cameron, D. M., & Evans, J. M. M. (2017) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.030 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Vitamin D and Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Poel, Y. H. M., Hummel, P., Lips, P., Stam, F., van der Ploeg, T., & Simsek, S. (2012) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2012.01.007 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Muche, A. A., Olayemi, O. O., & Gete, Y. K. (2019) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/s13690-019-0362-0 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vitamin D: Before, during and after Pregnancy: Effect on Neonates and Children
Mansur, J. L., Oliveri, B., Giacoia, E., Fusaro, D., & Costanzo, P. R. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14091900 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Cheong, L., Law, L. S.-C., Tan, L. Y. L., Amal, A. A.-A., Khoo, C. M., & Eng, P. C. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17071210 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, M., Chen, Z., Hu, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, Y., Lian, F., Li, H., Yang, J., & Xu, X.
- Affiliations
- Hangzhou Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Jun
- Xu, Xianrong
- Venue
- Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3148-3157
- ISSN
- 0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3115278955
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Keywords
- vitamin D supplementation, gestational diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, insulin resistance, HOMA-IR, fasting blood glucose, insulin, maternal outcomes, neonatal outcomes, cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, macrosomia, polyhydramnios, fetal distress, preterm birth, maternal hospitalization
- MeSH terms
- Glycemic Control, Blood Glucose, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Insulin, Pregnancy, Puerperal Disorders, Vitamin D, Vitamins, Diabetes, Gestational, Dietary Supplements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review