Cited by 39Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationGame Theory and ApplicationsExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Effects of update rules on networked n-player trust game dynamics

Open access
Chica, Manuel, Chiong, Raymond, Ramasco, José J., Abbass, Hussein·2019·Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.104870

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies on enhancing trust are usually carried out in the framework of one-shot interaction.

    “Although there were attempts for enhancing the level of trust from different aspects, we notice that these studies are usually carried out in the framework of one-shot interaction, to our knowledge [8, 9, 16, 24, 26].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. M. A. Nowak, Science 314, 1560 (2006).
  2. F. S. Grodzinsky, K. W. Miller, and M. J. Wolf, Philos- ophy & Technology 28, 91 (2015).
  3. E. Petraki and H. A. Abbass, in the 2014 Seventh IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications (CISDA) (IEEE, 2014) pp. 1- 7.
  4. H. Abbass, G. Greenwood, and E. Petraki, IEEE Trans- actions on Evolutionary Computation 20, 470 (2016).
  5. J. J. Jordan, M. Hoffman, M. A. Nowak, and D. G. Rand, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 8658 (2016).
  6. J. Berg, J. Dickhaut, and K. McCabe, Games and Eco- nomic Behavior 10, 122 (1995).
  7. J. C. Cox, Games and Economic Behavior 46, 260 (2004).
  8. B. King-Casas, D. Tomlin, C. Anen, C. F. Camerer, S. R. Quartz, and P. R. Montague, Science 308, 78 (2005).
  9. C. E. Tarnita, Games 6, 214 (2015).
  10. C. S. Gokhale and A. Traulsen, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 107, 5500 (2010).
  11. M. Chica, R. Chiong, M. Kirley, and H. Ishibuchi, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation (in press) xx, x (2017).
  12. A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, and G. Szabó, Physical Review E 80, 056104 (2009).
  13. M. A. Nowak and R. M. May, Nature 359, 826 (1992).
  14. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 47 (2002).
  15. A. L. Barabási and R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999).
  16. M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita, and T. Antal, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 365, 19 (2010).
  17. R. Chiong and M. Kirley, IEEE Transactions on Evolu- tionary Computation 16, 537 (2012).
  18. M. Chica and W. Rand, Journal of Marketing Research 54, 752 (2017).
  19. K. H. Schlag, Journal of Economic Theory 78, 130 (1998).
  20. R. A. Holley and T. M. Liggett, The Annals of Probabil- ity , 643 (1975).
  21. D. Vilone, J. J. Ramasco, A. Sánchez, and M. San Miguel, Physical Review E 90, 022810 (2014).
  22. D. Helbing, Physica A 181, 29 (1992).
  23. J. Fernández-Gracia, K. Suchecki, J. J. Ramasco, M. San Miguel, and V. M. Eguíluz, Physical Review Letters 112, 158701 (2014).
  24. C. J. Torney, A. Berdahl, and I. D. Couzin, PLoS Com- putational Biology 7, e1002194 (2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chica, M., Chiong, R., Ramasco, J. J., & Abbass, H.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Institute for Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Complex Systems (ES)
  • UNSW Canberra (AU)
Corresponding author
Chiong, Raymond
Venue
Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
79
Pages
104870
ISSN
1007-5704 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2777622448
Cited by
39
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
update rules, voter model, Wright-Fisher process, spatial networks, social network topology, trust dynamics, fractal structure, long-term memory, spatio-temporal correlation, multiplayer games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review