Cited by 294Stress Responses and CortisolCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseTryptophan and brain disorders

The conserved transcriptional response to adversity

Open access
Cole, Steven W·2019·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

Gene expression profiling studies of people exposed to chronic threat have identified a Conserved Transcriptional Response to Adversity (CTRA) in circulating immune cells. This physiological pattern is characterized by up-regulated expression of genes involved in inflammation and down-regulated expression of genes involved in Type I interferon responses. The CTRA is mediated by beta-adrenergic signaling pathways that transduce sympathetic nervous system activity into changes in transcription factor activity and hematopoietic output of myeloid lineage immune cells (monocytes, neutrophils, and dendritic cells). Recent research has begun to identify the CNS processes that regulate peripheral CTRA activity, define its implications for disease, and explore the role of positive psychosocial factors in buffering such effects. The CTRA provides a genomic framework for understanding PNI relationships and connecting macro-level psychosocial processes to the micro-level biology of health and disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.01.008

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CTRA transcriptomic pattern is defined by relative upregulation of 19 inflammatory genes and relative downregulation of 31 type-1 interferon response genes and three antibody synthesis genes.

    “Specifically, the CTRA transcriptomic pattern can be defined by relative upregulation of 19 inflammatory genes, and relative downregulation of 31 type-1 interferon response genes and three antibody synthesis genes [21,95] as displayed in Supplementary Table 5.”

    From Evaluation of exploratory fluid biomarkers from a phase 1 senolytic trial in mild Alzheimer's disease (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Introduction supports the broad pattern of increased inflammatory-gene expression and decreased type I interferon-gene expression. But the Measurement section explicitly says the CTRA is not defined by the 53-gene contrast; it is one way to measure the pattern. The paper does not give the claimed 19/31/3 breakdown. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The conserved transcriptional response to adversity (CTRA) is a 53-gene composite linked to chronic stress.

    “It will examine expression of the conserved transcriptional response to adversity (CTRA), a 53-gene composite associated with chronic stress, as well as involvement of lymphocyte subsets [24].”

    From Living Well: Protocol for a web-based program to improve quality of life in rural and urban ovarian cancer survivors (2024) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Introduction links the CTRA pattern to chronic stress. The Measurement section says the 53-gene contrast is one way to measure CTRA, not the definition of CTRA itself, so calling CTRA a 53-gene composite overstates the source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The CTRA has been proposed as a potential predictive biomarker for disease risk and pathogenesis related to inflammatory and interferon response alterations, and may have utility as an indicator of AD progression.

    “The CTRA has been proposed as a potential predictive biomarker for disease risk and pathogenesis related to diseases impacted by inflammatory and interferon response alterations including cancer and heart disease [96], and may have utility as an indicator of AD progression [21].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cole, S. W.
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
28
Pages
31-37
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2915157760
Cited by
294
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01-AG033590, P30-AG017265, R01-AG043404)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
conserved transcriptional response to adversity, gene expression profiling, circulating immune cells, inflammation, type I interferon response, beta-adrenergic signaling, sympathetic nervous system, monocytes, neutrophils, dendritic cells, central nervous system regulation, psychosocial factors, positive emotions, psychoneuroimmunology, adversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review