On the neural basis of focused and divided attention
Open accessAbstract
Concepts of higher attention functions distinguish focused and divided attention. The present study investigated whether these mental abilities are mediated by common or distinct neural substrates. In a first experiment, 19 healthy subjects were examined with functional brain imaging (fMRI) while they attended to either one or both of two simultaneously presented visual information streams and responded to repetitive stimuli. This experiment resembled a typical examination of these mental functions with the single task demanding focused and the dual task conditions requiring divided attention. Both conditions activated a widespread, mainly right-sided network including dorso- and ventrolateral prefrontal structures, superior and inferior parietal cortex, and anterior cingulate gyrus. Under higher cognitive demands of divided attention, activity in these structures was enhanced and left-sided homologues were recruited. In a second experiment investigating another 17 subjects with almost the same paradigm, it was accounted for that in most dual task investigations of focused and divided attention the single tasks are easier to process than their combined presentation. Therefore, the task difficulty of focused attention tasks was increased. Almost the same activity pattern observed during division of attention was now found during focusing attention. Comparing both attentional states matched for task difficulty, differences were found in visual but not in prefrontal or parietal cortex areas. Our results suggest that focused and divided attention depend on largely overlapping neuronal substrates. Differences in activation patterns, especially in prefrontal and parietal areas, may result from unequal demands on executive control due to disparate processing requirements in typical tasks of focused and divided attention: Easier conditions begin with mainly right-sided activity within the attention network. As conditions become more difficult, left-lateralized homologue areas activate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PFC is critically involved in guiding behavior during divided attention and working memory tasks, as well as in planning and decision making.
“Extensive research and recent imaging studies have shown that the PFC is critically involved in guiding behavior during divided attention (Nebel et al. [364]; Dannhauser et al. [365]) and working memory (Goldman-Rakic [366]; Adcock et al. [367]; Taylor et al. [368]; Marshuetz and Smith [369]; Müller and Knight [370]; Curtis [371]) tasks, as well as in planning (Rowe et al. [372]; Anderson et al. [”
From The Temporal Dynamics Model of Emotional Memory Processing: A Synthesis on the Neurobiological Basis of Stress-Induced Amnesia, Flashbulb and Traumatic Memories, and the Yerkes-Dodson Law (2007) · cites this paper as Nebel et al. [364]
Cites
The attention system of the human brain
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325 · Cited by 8,070 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Posner and Petersen [56] already suggested that the anterior cingulate is involved in target detection.”
BackgroundFunctional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing
Alexander, G. E., & Crutcher, M. D. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90107-l · Cited by 4,131 · see citing works
‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain
Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90066-3 · Cited by 1,913 · see citing works
How Many Subjects Constitute a Study?
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., & Worsley, K. J. (1999) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0439 · Cited by 814 · see citing works
The dependence of span and delayed-response performance on prefrontal cortex.
D’Esposito, M., & Postle, B. R. (1999) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00021-4 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Areas Involved in Encoding and Applying Directional Expectations to Moving Objects
Shulman, G. L., Ollinger, J. M., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., Snyder, A. Z., Petersen, S. E., & Corbetta, M. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-21-09480.1999 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diamond, D. M., Campbell, A. M., Park, C. R., Halonen, J., & Zoladz, P. R. (2007) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2007/60803 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
“…research and recent imaging studies have shown that the PFC is critically involved in guiding behavior during divided attention (Nebel et al. [364]; Dannhauser et al. [365]) and working memory (Goldman-Rakic [366]; Adcock et al. [367]; Taylor et al. [368]; Marshuetz and Smith [369]; M¨uller…”
ResultLangner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030694 · Cited by 746 · see citing works
Cieslik, E. C., Zilles, K., Caspers, S., Roski, C., Kellermann, T. S., Jakobs, O., Langner, R., Laird, A. R., Fox, P. T., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs256 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
“In line with this Nebel et al. (2005), investigating the neural substrates of focused and divided attention, found that the network components associated with attention processes (in particular, prefrontal and parietal areas) become more bilaterally active depending on task complexity.”
BackgroundLanguage control and lexical competition in bilinguals: an event-related fMRI study
Abutalebi, J., Annoni, J.-M., Zimine, I., Pegna, A. J., Seghier, M. L., Lee-Jahnke, H., Lazeyras, F., Cappa, S. F., & Khateb, A. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm182 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Cerebellar neurocognition: insights into the bottom of the brain
Baillieux, H., Smet, H. J. D., Paquier, P. F., De Deyn, P. P., & Mariën, P. (2008) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.05.013 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Effects of aging on circadian patterns of gene expression in the human prefrontal cortex
Chen, C.-Y., Logan, R. W., Ma, T., Lewis, D. A., Tseng, G. C., Sibille, E., & McClung, C. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1508249112 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Attention and executive functions profile in drug naive ADHD subtypes
Pasini, A., Paloscia, C., Alessandrelli, R., Porfirio, M. C., & Curatolo, P. (2007) · Brain and Development · doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2006.11.010 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
On how high performers keep cool brains in situations of cognitive overload
JAEGGI, S. M., BUSCHKUEHL, M., ETIENNE, A., OZDOBA, C., PERRIG, W. J., & NIRKKO, A. C. (2007) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.7.2.75 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Iimori, T., Nakajima, S., Miyazaki, T., Tarumi, R., Ogyu, K., Wada, M., Tsugawa, S., Masuda, F., Daskalakis, Z. J., Blumberger, D. M., et al. (2019) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.06.014 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Neural basis of multisensory looming signals
Tyll, S., Bonath, B., Schoenfeld, M. A., Heinze, H.-J., Ohl, F. W., & Noesselt, T. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.056 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
The functional neuroanatomy of multitasking: Combining dual tasking with a short term memory task
Deprez, S., Vandenbulcke, M., Peeters, R., Emsell, L., Amant, F., & Sunaert, S. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.024 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Heinzel, S., Rimpel, J., Stelzel, C., & Rapp, M. A. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00085 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nebel, K., Wiese, H., Stude, P., de Greiff, A., Diener, H.-C., & Keidel, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
- Bayreuth Medical Center (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Nebel, Katharina
- ORCID
- Wiese, Holger
- Venue
- Cognitive Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 760-776
- ISSN
- 0926-6410 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963589947
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Cognitive Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- focused attention, divided attention, dual-task performance, prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, hemispheric lateralization, executive function, task difficulty, visual attention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Cognition, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Nerve Net, Parietal Lobe, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
