Cited by 45Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and MemoryNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Transfer Effects to a Multimodal Dual-Task after Working Memory Training and Associated Neural Correlates in Older Adults – A Pilot Study

Open access
Heinzel, Stephan, Rimpel, Jérôme, Stelzel, Christine, Rapp, Michael A.·2017·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Working memory (WM) performance declines with age. However, several studies have shown that WM training may lead to performance increases not only in the trained task, but also in untrained cognitive transfer tasks. It has been suggested that transfer effects occur if training task and transfer task share specific processing components that are supposedly processed in the same brain areas. In the current study, we investigated whether single-task WM training and training-related alterations in neural activity might support performance in a dual-task setting, thus assessing transfer effects to higher-order control processes in the context of dual-task coordination. A sample of older adults (age 60-72) was assigned to either a training or control group. The training group participated in twelve sessions of an adaptive n-back training. At pre and post measurement, a multimodal dual-task was performed in all participants to assess transfer effects. This task consisted of two simultaneous delayed match to sample WM tasks using two different stimulus modalities (visual and auditory) that were performed either in isolation (single-task) or in conjunction (dual-task). A subgroup also participated in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) during the performance of the n-back task before and after training. While no transfer to single-task performance was found, dual-task costs in both the visual modality (p < .05) and the auditory modality (p < .05) decreased at post measurement in the training but not in the control group. In the fMRI subgroup of the training participants, neural activity changes in left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during 1-back predicted post-training auditory dual-task costs, while neural activity changes in right DLPFC during 3-back predicted visual dual-task costs. Results might indicate an improvement in central executive processing that could facilitate both WM and dual-task coordination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00085

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Working memory training can also transfer to tasks in other cognitive domains, such as fluid intelligence.

    “as well as tasks pertaining to other cognitive domains such as fluid intelligence (Jaeggi et al. 2008; Heinzel et al. 2017; Chein and Morrison 2010; Borella et al. 2010)”

    From Divergent Research Methods Limit Understanding of Working Memory Training (2020) · cites this paper as Heinzel et al. 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heinzel, S., Rimpel, J., Stelzel, C., & Rapp, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Rapp, Michael A.
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2017-02-24
Volume
11
Pages
85-85
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2590843523
Cited by
45
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver (cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RA1047/4-1), 01GQ0914, FOR1617, SPP1772, 01QG87164, 01GS08195)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01QG87164, 01GQ0914, 01GS08195)
  • Universität Potsdam
  • Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
working memory training, transfer of learning, dual-task performance, older adults, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review