The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Human Function Compunction: Teleological explanation in adults
Abstract
Research has found that children possess a broad bias in favor of teleological--or purpose-based--explanations of natural phenomena. The current two experiments explored whether adults implicitly possess a similar bias. In Study 1, undergraduates judged a series of statements as "good" (i.e., correct) or "bad" (i.e., incorrect) explanations for why different phenomena occur. Judgments occurred in one of three conditions: fast speeded, moderately speeded, or unspeeded. Participants in speeded conditions judged significantly more scientifically unwarranted teleological explanations as correct (e.g., "the sun radiates heat because warmth nurtures life"), but were not more error-prone on control items (e.g., unwarranted physical explanations such as "hills form because floodwater freezes"). Study 2 extended these findings by examining the relationship between different aspects of adults' "promiscuous teleology" and other variables such as scientific knowledge, religious beliefs, and inhibitory control. Implications of these findings for scientific literacy are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the creative power of blind selection also conflicts with our teleological intuitions (in the sense of goal-directedness) about functional complexity, and our intuitive design stance (Kelemen and Rosset 2009; Reiss 2009).”
From Natural Selection Does Care about Truth (2014) · cites this paper as Kelemen and Rosset 2009
In the citing paper
“Subsequent experiments have demonstrated that teleological thinking is a cognitive default, to which people resort if they have no alternative explanations.”
From The Challenge of Evolution to Religion (2019) · cites this paper as Kelemen & Rosset, 2009
In the citing paper
“These intuitions tend to translate in religious beliefs, but they can also contribute to a 103 quasi-religious view on nature [30,31].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204507 · Cited by 2,802
Child's Conception of the World
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315006215 · Cited by 2,689
The essential child: origins of essentialism in everyday thought
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1239 · Cited by 1,380
Wright, L. (1973) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2183766 · Cited by 983
Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection
Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10053 · Cited by 575
The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children
Kelemen, D. A. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00010-4 · Cited by 493
Self-citationQualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution
Shtulman, A. (2005) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001 · Cited by 367
Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of th natural world.
Kelemen, D. (1999) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1440 · Cited by 356 · cited 6×
“For example, from preschool, children attribute functions to entities like lions, mountains, and icebergs, viewing them as ‘‘made for something” (Kelemen, 1999a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMisconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students
Brumby, M. (1984) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730680412 · Cited by 325
Functional explanation and the function of explanation
Lombrozo, T., & Carey, S. E. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.009 · Cited by 301
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Keil, 1992, The origins of an autonomous biology, Vol. 25, 103
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 479
Why does intellectuality weaken faith and sometimes foster it?
Çağlar, M. E. (2020) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00567-y · Cited by 4
“Then, the individual’s sense of Self (consciousness) is simply the way in which God knows himself, as Koninck (1994) cited from Aristoteles; God is the thought thinking itself.”
BackgroundHohenstein, J. M., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2022) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21783 · Cited by 3
DESIGN DISCOURSE AND THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE OF DESIGN
de Ridder, J. (2014) · Philosophia Reformata · doi:10.1163/22116117-90000561 · Cited by 3
Riekki, T. J. J. (2014) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 3
Anthropic thinking about global climate change
Betz, N. (2019) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20318389 · Cited by 4
Understanding ‘How’: Two kinds of mechanistic explanations underlie known explanation preferencesPreprint
Joo, S., Yousif, S. R., & Keil, F. C. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qczb7 · Cited by 4
Mapping students' ideas about chemical reactions at different educational levels
Yan, F. (2015) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 3
Counting hiddenness: cognitive science and the distribution of belief in God
Green, A. (2023) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412523000860 · Cited by 2
“12 One other area in which children seem developmentally disposed to be friendly to religion has to do with teleological reasoning (Keleman 2004; Keleman and Rosset 2009).”
Mækelæ, M. J., Kreis, I. V., & Pfuhl, G. (2024) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14532 · Cited by 2
Perceiving persons and their purposes: teleology, normativity, and personal identity
Christy, A. G., & Schlegel, R. J. (2024) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2024.2314921 · Cited by 3
“These researchers have also found that adults become more accepting of teleological explanations (e.g., “Water exists so that life can survive on Earth”) when responding under cognitively taxing conditions, such as speeded trials (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009).”
BackgroundSoul Mates? Conflicts and Complementarities in the Evolutionary and Cognitive Sciences of Religion
Sosis, R. H., Shaver, J. H., Purzycki, B. G., & Kiper, J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190693350.013.17 · Cited by 2
Autism and the Panoply of Religious Belief, Disbelief and Experience
Clark, K. J., & Visuri, I. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.014 · Cited by 2
Religious Intuitions and the Nature of “Belief”
Alogna, V. K., Bering, J. M., Balkcom, E., & Halberstadt, J. B. (2019) · Studia Humana · doi:10.2478/sh-2019-0025 · Cited by 2
“The strongest evidence for these provocative claims is the fact that, in some situations, even die-hard nonbelievers behave as though they believe [10], [34], [39], [42], [43], [47].”
BackgroundJohnson, A. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.015 · Cited by 2
Empirical Challenges to the Evidential Problem of Evil
McAllister, B., Church, I. M., Rezkalla, P., & Nguyen, L. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198918905.003.0009 · Cited by 2
Role of inhibitory control in adults’ mathematical equivalence knowledge
Grenell, A., & Fyfe, E. R. (2024) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218241280941 · Cited by 2
“However, research on conceptual change in math and science suggests that these naïve, child-like conceptions can exist alongside the more formal, adult-like conceptions (e.g., Goldberg, Thompson-Schill, 2009; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009).”
Causal Explanations and the Growth of Understanding
Keil, F. C. (2024) · Annual Review of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-devpsych-010923-103603 · Cited by 3
How Cultural Input Shapes the Development of Idealized Biological Prototypes
Foster‐Hanson, E., Ziska, K. M., & Rhodes, M. (2024) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2024.2409680 · Cited by 2
“…biological categories, people also tend to make certain assumptions about these common features, particularly that they must serve some function or purpose (Atran, 1994; Foster-Hanson & Lombrozo, 2022; Keil, 1994; Kelemen, 1999; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Kelemen et al., 2013; Medin & Atran, 1999).”
The Role of Concept Inventories in Course Assessment
Libarkin, J. C., Jardeleza, S. E., & McElhinny, T. L. (2013) · Innovations in science education and technology · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6946-5_20 · Cited by 2
Bautista, R. G. (2015) · Journal of Technology and Science Education · doi:10.3926/jotse.137 · Cited by 2
“These fndings support the claim of Kelemen and Rosset (2009) when they said that educatonal procedures and learning exposures alleviate the learner’s tendency to anthropomorphize.”
BackgroundColes, A. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.002 · Cited by 2
Stern, F., Kampourakis, K., Delaval, M., & Müller, A. (2021) · Contributions from biology education research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86051-6_9 · Cited by 3
Disciplining the Slaves of God
Giorda, M. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.011 · Cited by 2
Cooper, K., & Wood, J. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.002 · Cited by 2
Objawienia i duchy gór - doświadczenia, instytucje i organizacje religijne
Halemba, A. (2014) · Prace Etnograficzne · doi:10.4467/22999558.pe.14.003.1704 · Cited by 2
Wolff’s Science of Teleology and Kant’s Critique
Hamid, N. (2019) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0006.017 · Cited by 2
The Scientific Study of Religion
Collicutt, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.003 · Cited by 2
Barrett, J. L. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_223 · Cited by 2
The Cognitive Underpinnings of Ideological Thinking
Zmigrod, L. (2019) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.44894 · Cited by 2
New Cognitive and Cultural Evolutionary Approaches on AtheismPreprint
Coleman, T. J., III, Messick, K. J., & van Mulukom, V. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ze5mv · Cited by 2
Explanations in the wildPreprint
Sulik, J., van Paridon, J., & Lupyan, G. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/djaex · Cited by 2
“Indeed, both laypeople (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009) and experts (Kelemen et al., 2013) may ascribe functions even when they are causally inappropriate.”
When God Dies: Deconversion from Theism as Analogous to the Experience of Death
Simpson, W. D. (2013) · TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) · Cited by 2
Common-Sense Chemistry: The Use of Assumptions and Heuristics in Problem Solving
Maeyer, J. R. (2013) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 2
Reading Thecla in Fourth-Century Pontus
Corke‐Webster, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.019 · Cited by 1
Scientific or naïve? Perceptions of direct and indirect realism, and why they matter
Fischer, E., Allen, K., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2025) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.70063 · Cited by 1
“…2018) and get initially activated upon engagement with the verification task; hence, the naïve theory must be effortfully suppressed, to facilitate the scientifically informed response (Goldberg &Thompson-Schill, 2009; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Shtulman & Legare, 2020; Shtulman & Valcarcel, 2012).”
Galli, L. G. (2025) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-025-00713-5 · Cited by 1
“…domain (Casler & Kelemen, 2007, 2008; DiYanni & Kelemen, 2005; Kelemen, 1999a, b, c, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2012; Kelemen & Carey, 2007; Kelemen & DiYanni, 2005; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Kelemen et al., 2013; Kelemen et al., 2012; Keleman et al., 2003; Kelemen et al., 2005; Schachner et al., 2017).”
Chuan, S., Hu, Y., Chen, F., Lenz, S., Li, J., Feng, Y., Zeng, X., & Wu, M. (2026) · Journal of Social Cognition and Communication · doi:10.63802/jscc.v1.i1.291 · Cited by 2
Cognitive and Socio-Cultural Development of Religious Belief in Children
Burdett, E. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009461924 · Cited by 1
Engvild, K. C. (2015) · Ideas in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.4033/iee.2015.8.2.n · Cited by 2
Why the Novel Happened: A Cognitive Explanation
Jackson, T. E. (2014) · Philosophy and literature · doi:10.1353/phl.2014.0025 · Cited by 1
Students’ Teleologic and Anthropomorphic References to Select Concepts of Environmental Science
Isleta-Palatino, L. I. (2014) · American Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12691/education-2-2-6 · Cited by 1
Philosophical Hazards in the Neuroscientific Study of Religion
Haan, D. D. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.007 · Cited by 2
Methodological Hazards in the Neuroscientific Study of Religion
Judge, S. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.004 · Cited by 1
Phenomenology, Neurology, Psychiatry and Religious Commitment
Kidd, I. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.006 · Cited by 1
Limberis, V. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.005 · Cited by 1
Larsen, L. I. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.010 · Cited by 1
al., R. G. B. E. (2021) · Türk bilgisayar ve matematik eğitimi dergisi · doi:10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.2174 · Cited by 2
Boury, N. M., van den Bogaard, M., Wasendorf, C., Amon, J. D., Judson, S., Maroushek, S. R., & Peters, N. T. (2022) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00125-22 · Cited by 2
Universal Cognitive Biases as the Basis for Supernatural Beliefs
Willard, A. K., Turpin, H., & Baimel, A. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198869252.013.46 · Cited by 6
The invisible hand as an intuitive sociological explanation
Jonušaitė, I., & Ullman, T. D. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104546 · Cited by 2
Subjective Understanding is Reduced by Mechanistic Framing
Zemla, J. C., & Corral, D. (2024) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.393 · Cited by 2
Greenway, T. S., Barrett, J. L., & Furrow, J. L. (2016) · Journal of Psychology and Theology · doi:10.1177/009164711604400301 · Cited by 1
Evolutionary Developmental Psychology of Children’s Religious Beliefs
Greenway, T. S., & Barrett, J. L. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199397747.013.7 · Cited by 1
Eyghen, H. V. (2019) · Studia Humana · doi:10.2478/sh-2019-0005 · Cited by 1
How the Tiger Changed Its Stripes
(2019) · The American Biology Teacher · doi:10.1525/abt.2019.81.8.599 · Cited by 1
Parkinson’s Disease, Religious Belief and Spirituality
Barker, R. A., & Redfern, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.011 · Cited by 1
Religion and Spirituality in Neuro-Rehabilitation
Collicutt, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.017 · Cited by 1
Towards an Islamic Neuropsychiatry
Aggarwal, N. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.009 · Cited by 1
Personhood and Religion in People with Dementia
Hughes, J. C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.015 · Cited by 1
Wood, J. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.014 · Cited by 1
Human tool cognition relies on teleology
Hernik, M. (2020) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x20000278 · Cited by 1
Stefaniw, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.016 · Cited by 1
Cooper, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.007 · Cited by 1
Religion as Cultural: Culture Shapes Cognitive Mechanisms
Szocik, K., & Eyghen, H. V. (2021) · New approaches to the scientific study of religion · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63516-9_8 · Cited by 1
Demystifying Mysteries. How Metaphors and Analogies Extend the Reach of the Human Mind
Boudry, M., Vlerick, M., & Edis, T. (2022) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-90688-7_4 · Cited by 1
Liefgreen, A., Yousif, S. R., Keil, F. C., & Lagnado, D. A. (2020) · Cognitive Science · Cited by 1
Implicit questions shape information preferences.
Joo, S., Yousif, S. R., & Keil, F. C. (2020) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Что мы знаем об устройстве интуитивных теорий?
Курбанов, К., & Феликсович, С. В. (2023) · Психологические исследования · doi:10.54359/ps.v16i90.1438
The Consequences of Anthropomorphic and Teleological Beliefs in a Global Pandemic
Roberts, A., Handley, S. J., & Polito, V. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14020146 · Cited by 1
“After controlling for belief in natural selection and belief in the existence of souls, Kelemen and Rosset [15] found no evidence that belief in God predicted teleological acceptance.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSvedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M. (2013) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 1
The Nature and Variability of Children's Alternative Conceptions of Evolution
Ly, U. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Measurement issues and the role of cognitive biases in conspiracist ideation
Brotherton, R. (2013) · Goldsmiths Research Online · Cited by 1
Dead people and living spirits: lessons from developmental psychology on what is intuitive
Emmons, N. A. (2015) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2015.1015050 · Cited by 1
“For example, Kelemen and Rosset (2009) found that when adults were forced to make judgments quickly and did not have time to reflect, they tended to accept scientifically unwarranted purpose-based explanations to explain natural events – much like young children have been found to do (Kelemen,…”
BackgroundWare, E. A., & Gelman, S. A. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12197 · Cited by 1
“…reasoning (e.g., Jensen & Finley, 1996; Settlage, 1994; Tamir & Zohar, 1991) and is often used interchangeably with “need-based” (e.g., explaining that organisms acquire traits because they need them to survive) (e.g., Kelemen & Rossett, 2009; Nehm & Ridgway, 2011; Rector, Nehm, & Pearl, 2012).”
MethodWar and AlgorithmPreprint
Liljefors, M., Noll, G., & Steuer, D. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3908985 · Cited by 1
Barrett, J. L. (2021) · The Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Religion · doi:10.1002/9781119009924.eopr0079 · Cited by 1
Explanatory drawings prioritize functional properties at the expense of visual fidelityPreprint
Huey, H., Lu, X., Walker, C. M., & Fan, J. E. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9hmzj · Cited by 1
Are religious rituals always causally opaque?
Larson, J. (2023) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2023.2186933 · Cited by 1
“…gods achieved desired outcomes was rarely at issue for ritual participants, for this kind of causal inference does not at all require that we know how something is accomplished in order to expect or conclude that it is the result of personal agency (Kelemen & Rossetm, 2009; Kundert & Edman, 2017).”
Molecules, cells and minds : aspects of bioscientific explanation
Powell, A. M. (2009) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University) · Cited by 1
Implicit Cultures: Towards a Psychosocial Theory of ‘Intuitive Religious Beliefs’
McVicar, T. J. (2011) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.16993138.v1
BRIEF REPORT Divine Intuition: Cognitive Style Influences Belief in God
Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012)
Differences That Make A Difference: A Study in Collaborative Learning
Touchman, S. (2012) · ProQuest LLC eBooks
Sandell, M. (2010)
Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012)
Student concepts of natural selection from a resource-based perspective
Benjamin, S. (2016) · OpenBU (Boston University)
Periss, V. A., & Bjorklund, D. F. (2016) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12342178
An examination of the extent of adults' social essentialism
Eidson, R. C. (2014) · doi:10.17760/d20005094
Ghosts of Theories Past: The Ever-Present Influence of Long-Discarded Theories.
Shtulman, A., & Valcarcel, J. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
The Adaptive Nature of Children's Supernatural Thinking
Bjorklund, D. F., Blasi, C. H., & Periss, V. A. (2010)
Promiscuous teleology and folk metaphysics
Rosé, D. (2017) · doi:10.7282/t3f76ggw
Introduction: Homo Religiosus and the Dragon
Barrett, J., & Hornbeck, R. (2017) · New approaches to the scientific study of religion · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62954-4_1 · Cited by 1
Factors of Religiosity and Loss Aversion
Howatt, B. C. (2017) · Arizona State University Library Digital Repository (Arizona State University)
Are there Limits to Evolutionary Explanations?
Werth, A. J. (2018) · Journal of Natural Sciences · doi:10.15640/jns.v5n2a1
“Studies repeatedly show (Kelemen and Rosset 2009) that even when we consciously try to break the teleological paradigm, we subconsciously revert to this heuristic.”
BackgroundWaggoner, B. (2018) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
The Accusations Against Vaccinations on the Internet: Autism, Mercury and Immunological Overload
Grignolio, A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68106-1_3
Are there Limits to Evolutionary Explanations?
Werth, A. J. (2017) · Journal of Physical Education and Sports Management · doi:10.15640/jpesm.v4n2a1
중등 학생들의 세 가지 진화적 설명에 대한 수용 문항의 타당도 탐색 및 개념 군집 분석
Ha, M. (2017) · BIOLOGY EDUCATION · doi:10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.4.467
McDonough, T. (2018) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2018.24
“Much work has been done on the notion of ‘promiscuous teleology’ and the ways in which humans ascribe functions and values to inanimate and, indeed, abstract entities, properties, and processes (see Kelemen and Rosset, 2009; Tomasello, 2018).”
BackgroundThe ordinary concept of weakness of will
Heris, A. Y. (2019) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-019-09617-6
Temporal Lobe Epilepsy, Dostoyevsky and Irrational Significance
Coles, A. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.010
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kelemen, Deborah
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 138-143
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073307787
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 141.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- teleological reasoning, implicit reasoning, scientific literacy, religious beliefs, inhibitory control, scientific knowledge, explanation evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Reading, Religion, Intuition, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review