The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Human Function Compunction: Teleological explanation in adults
Abstract
Research has found that children possess a broad bias in favor of teleological--or purpose-based--explanations of natural phenomena. The current two experiments explored whether adults implicitly possess a similar bias. In Study 1, undergraduates judged a series of statements as "good" (i.e., correct) or "bad" (i.e., incorrect) explanations for why different phenomena occur. Judgments occurred in one of three conditions: fast speeded, moderately speeded, or unspeeded. Participants in speeded conditions judged significantly more scientifically unwarranted teleological explanations as correct (e.g., "the sun radiates heat because warmth nurtures life"), but were not more error-prone on control items (e.g., unwarranted physical explanations such as "hills form because floodwater freezes"). Study 2 extended these findings by examining the relationship between different aspects of adults' "promiscuous teleology" and other variables such as scientific knowledge, religious beliefs, and inhibitory control. Implications of these findings for scientific literacy are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the creative power of blind selection also conflicts with our teleological intuitions (in the sense of goal-directedness) about functional complexity, and our intuitive design stance (Kelemen and Rosset 2009; Reiss 2009).”
From Natural Selection Does Care about Truth (2014) · cites this paper as Kelemen and Rosset 2009
In the citing paper
“Subsequent experiments have demonstrated that teleological thinking is a cognitive default, to which people resort if they have no alternative explanations.”
From The Challenge of Evolution to Religion (2019) · cites this paper as Kelemen & Rosset, 2009
In the citing paper
“These intuitions tend to translate in religious beliefs, but they can also contribute to a 103 quasi-religious view on nature [30,31].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204507 · Cited by 2,802
Child's Conception of the World
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315006215 · Cited by 2,689
The essential child: origins of essentialism in everyday thought
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1239 · Cited by 1,380
Wright, L. (1973) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2183766 · Cited by 983
Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection
Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10053 · Cited by 575
The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children
Kelemen, D. A. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00010-4 · Cited by 493
Self-citationQualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution
Shtulman, A. (2005) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001 · Cited by 367
Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of th natural world.
Kelemen, D. (1999) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1440 · Cited by 356 · cited 6×
“For example, from preschool, children attribute functions to entities like lions, mountains, and icebergs, viewing them as ‘‘made for something” (Kelemen, 1999a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMisconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students
Brumby, M. (1984) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730680412 · Cited by 325
Functional explanation and the function of explanation
Lombrozo, T., & Carey, S. E. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.009 · Cited by 301
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Keil, 1992, The origins of an autonomous biology, Vol. 25, 103
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–479 of 479
Embodied Cognition and the Neurology of Religion
Brown, W. S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.005
Near-Death and Out-of-Body Experiences
Marsh, M. N. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.020
Chappell, S. G. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.008
Examining the Continuum of Life to Determine Death
Buchman, A. S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.019
Breve reflexão acerca da naturalidade cognitiva das crenças religiosas
Silva, T., & Mariano, R. B. (2019) · Religare Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências das Religiões da UFPB · doi:10.22478/ufpb.1982-6605.2019v16n2.44434
God Naturally, Disorder Actually
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.003.0001
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.003.0002
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.003.0003
Searching for the Gods’ Minds the Hard Way
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.003.0005
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.003.0006
Scrupulosity, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Ritual
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.003.0004
Gervais, W. M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199397747.013.3
Power, Faith, and Reciprocity in a Slave Society
Tallon, J. R. R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.006
Natal, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.020
de Wet, C. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.009
Markauskas, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.017
Dimambro, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.021
Beit‐Hallahmi, B. (2020) · Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion · doi:10.1558/jcsr.42183
Belova, A. D. (2020) · Study of Religion · doi:10.22250/2072-8662.2020.4.76-82
Ertekin, P., Akkaya, G., & Köksal, M. S. (2021) · Hacettepe University Journal of Education · doi:10.16986/huje.2021066643
Szocik, K., & Eyghen, H. V. (2021) · New approaches to the scientific study of religion · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63516-9_2
Stereotypes of nihilists are overwhelmingly negative
Scott, M. J., & Cohen, A. B. (2021) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2021.1902922 · Cited by 2
“© 2021 Taylor & Francis 2005; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Kelemen et al., 2013), stating that life is meaningless likely signals key psychological differences that uniquely alter social impressions by violating expectations.”
BackgroundNeuroantropologiczne badanie religii
Grzegorczyk, G. (2020) · Nurt SVD
Natural belief in persistent selves
Collier, M. (2021) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2021.1959907
“We are naturally “promiscuous teleologists”, as Keleman and Rosset put it, with a natural tendency to interpret natural phenomena in terms of purposes (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009, p. 138).”
BackgroundThe consequences of anthropomorphic and teleological beliefs in a global pandemicPreprint
Roberts, A., Handley, S. J., & Polito, V. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ewn65
Wingert, J. R., Bassett, G. M., Terry, C. E., & Lee, J. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1226177/v1
Coles, A. J., & Collicutt, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.001
(2015) · Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.pufc.14287
Coles, A. J., & Collicutt, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.022
(2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316014165.021
Cooper, K., & Wood, J. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.003
‘Slaves, be subject to your masters’
Cooper, K., & Wood, J. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.008
Knowledge, Power, and Symbolic Violence
Cooper, K., & Wood, J. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.012
Cooper, K., & Wood, J. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.022
(2018) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.1111/mono.12368
Cooper, K., & Wood, J. P. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.001
Cooper, K., & Wood, J. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.018
Cooper, K., & Wood, J. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783491.023
Does Speeded Decision-Making Reveal Tacit Teleological Tendencies?Preprint
Roberts, A., Handley, S. J., & Polito, V. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pxhqe
(2018) · Presses Universitaires de France eBooks · doi:10.3917/puf.cordo.2018.01.0327
Suspicious Minds: The Link Between Stress and Perceptions of Agency
Meier, J. (2020) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17151278
Szocik, K., & Eyghen, H. V. (2021) · New approaches to the scientific study of religion · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63516-9_10
(2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817443-2.00025-2
Lee, H., Park, H., Gim, M.-S., Sohn, B. K., & Kim, W. (2022) · 신경정신의학 · doi:10.4306/jknpa.2022.61.3.196
Unfulfilled Promise of Cross-Cultural, Interdisciplinary Ancient History
Nichols, R. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Historiography · doi:10.1558/jch.39458
Cognition and religiosity: Who is most likely to believe?
Zmigrod, L. (2019) · PsyPag Quarterly · doi:10.53841/bpspag.2019.1.111.22
Cross-Curricular Nature of Evolutionary Biology
Martín-Peciña, M. (2023) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-5765-8.ch004
Punishment without Blame, Shame, or Just Deserts
Waller, B. N. (2023) · Palgrave handbooks in the philosophy of law · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11874-6_21
Yu, C. H., Cole, J. M., & Whitney, W. (2023) · Journal of Social and Political Sciences · doi:10.31014/aior.1991.06.02.422
DeWolf, S., van den Bogaard, M., Hart, R. B., Hartman, S., Boury, N. M., & Phillips, G. J. (2023) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00094-23
(2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-13829-4.00015-5
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.002.0006
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.002.0004
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.002.0003
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.002.0007
From artifacts to human lives: Investigating the domain-generality of judgments about purposes.
Prinzing, M., Rosé, D., Zhang, S., Tu, E., Concha, A., Rea, M. C., Schaffer, J., Gerstenberg, T., & Knobe, J. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001709
Willard, A. K., Turpin, H., & Baimel, A. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/aubem_v1
Means to an end: teleological bias in moral reasoning
Davenport, E., & Coley, J. D. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1380048
“…cause is known, people often explain its existence with goal-based influences (Banerjee and Bloom, 2014; Kampourakis, 2020; Kelemen, 1999a,b; Kelemen and Rosset, 2009; Legare et al., 2012; Legare and Gelman, 2008; Legare and Visala, 2011; Lupfer et al., 1992; Lupfer et al., 1994; Lupfer et…”
Embodied constructivism: the imagination as a vehicle for mental time travel
Fatona, B. (2025) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412525100905
“It has been shown in experiments that both children and adults have a bias for teleological explanations, over causal ones, for natural phenomena such as natural selection (Bloom and Weisberg 2007) and (Kelemen and Rosset 2009).”
Hartelt, T., & Martens, H. (2025) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2025.2546795
“…preparation time (Menzel and Carrell 1994) and time pressure (Kellogg, Hopka, and Ashcraft 1999) generally have negative effects on performance, e.g. people prefer non-causal explanations rather than scientifically accurate causal explanations when time is constrained (Kelemen and Rosset 2009).”
Herrmann, A., Schulze, C., Lange‐Schubert, K., & Saalbach, H. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102216
Love is in the soul, math is in the brain: Dualist intuitions and belief in psychological science
Cruz, F., & Mata, A. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104845 · Cited by 1
Smith, E. I. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Additional file 1 of Educational potential of teaching evolution as an interdisciplinary science
Hanisch, S., & Eirdosh, D. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13336438
Teleology and genericsPreprint
Rosé, D., Zhang, S., Han, Q., & Gerstenberg, T. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/p5zt4
Ripoll, T. (2025) · Anthropocene - humanities and social sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02080-2_3
Salazar, C. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191822285.003.0007
Religious Studies Kaleidoscope
Byrtus, R., Bubík, T., Herníková, V., Hurtík, J., Jedličková, L., Kubálková, K., Mizia, C. A., Muczková, M., Svobodníková, N., Šimonová, M., et al. (2025) · doi:10.5507/ff.25.24467009
Bahtişen, G. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6276259
Positive valence increases children’s teleological explanations of natural events
Linetsky, K. A., Robinson, L. W., Feiler, J. B., & Scofield, J. M. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2026.106511
The Phenomenology of Psychedelic Experiences
Pavăl, D. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in religious studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-20214-7_2
How origin stories shape children’s social reasoningPreprint
Rhodes, M., & Foster‐Hanson, E. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Primary School Learning Topics Involving Inhibitory Control: A Scoping Review
Bélanger, É., Moyon, M., Foisy, L. B., & Masson, S. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-026-10198-5
“Consistent with prior inhibitory control research (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Kelemen et al., 2013), incongruent items were generally associated with longer response times and lower accuracy, patterns that are consistent with the recruitment of inhibitory control.”
Fortuna, A. M. D., Picione, R. D. L., & Tateo, L. (2026) · Theory and history in the human and social sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26797-9_4
Steinseide, M. K., Henriksen, M. R., Gya, R., & Nyléhn, J. (2026) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2026.2719521
Burton, A. R., Davenport, E., Bissonnette, S. A., Tanner, K. D., & Coley, J. D. (2026) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.26-02-0035
Hoffman, B. H. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800779-2.00012-9
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kelemen, Deborah
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 138-143
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073307787
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 141.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- teleological reasoning, implicit reasoning, scientific literacy, religious beliefs, inhibitory control, scientific knowledge, explanation evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Reading, Religion, Intuition, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
