The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Human Function Compunction: Teleological explanation in adults
Abstract
Research has found that children possess a broad bias in favor of teleological--or purpose-based--explanations of natural phenomena. The current two experiments explored whether adults implicitly possess a similar bias. In Study 1, undergraduates judged a series of statements as "good" (i.e., correct) or "bad" (i.e., incorrect) explanations for why different phenomena occur. Judgments occurred in one of three conditions: fast speeded, moderately speeded, or unspeeded. Participants in speeded conditions judged significantly more scientifically unwarranted teleological explanations as correct (e.g., "the sun radiates heat because warmth nurtures life"), but were not more error-prone on control items (e.g., unwarranted physical explanations such as "hills form because floodwater freezes"). Study 2 extended these findings by examining the relationship between different aspects of adults' "promiscuous teleology" and other variables such as scientific knowledge, religious beliefs, and inhibitory control. Implications of these findings for scientific literacy are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the creative power of blind selection also conflicts with our teleological intuitions (in the sense of goal-directedness) about functional complexity, and our intuitive design stance (Kelemen and Rosset 2009; Reiss 2009).”
From Natural Selection Does Care about Truth (2014) · cites this paper as Kelemen and Rosset 2009
In the citing paper
“Subsequent experiments have demonstrated that teleological thinking is a cognitive default, to which people resort if they have no alternative explanations.”
From The Challenge of Evolution to Religion (2019) · cites this paper as Kelemen & Rosset, 2009
In the citing paper
“These intuitions tend to translate in religious beliefs, but they can also contribute to a 103 quasi-religious view on nature [30,31].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204507 · Cited by 2,802
Child's Conception of the World
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315006215 · Cited by 2,689
The essential child: origins of essentialism in everyday thought
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1239 · Cited by 1,380
Wright, L. (1973) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2183766 · Cited by 983
Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection
Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10053 · Cited by 575
The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children
Kelemen, D. A. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00010-4 · Cited by 493
Self-citationQualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution
Shtulman, A. (2005) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001 · Cited by 367
Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of th natural world.
Kelemen, D. (1999) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1440 · Cited by 356 · cited 6×
“For example, from preschool, children attribute functions to entities like lions, mountains, and icebergs, viewing them as ‘‘made for something” (Kelemen, 1999a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMisconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students
Brumby, M. (1984) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730680412 · Cited by 325
Functional explanation and the function of explanation
Lombrozo, T., & Carey, S. E. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.009 · Cited by 301
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Keil, 1992, The origins of an autonomous biology, Vol. 25, 103
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Causes and consequences of mind perception
Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., & Wegner, D. M. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.006 · Cited by 759
Understanding Natural Selection: Essential Concepts and Common Misconceptions
Gregory, T. R. (2009) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1 · Cited by 574
“It therefore reappears easily even in those with some basic scientific training; for example, in descriptions of ecological balance (“fungi grow in forests to help decomposition”) or species survival (“finches diversified in order to survive”; Kelemen and Rosset 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialDivine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God.
Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0025391 · Cited by 557
Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0030399 · Cited by 429
Self-citationScientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions
Shtulman, A., & Valcarcel, J. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.005 · Cited by 418
“…evidence for the persistence of early intuitions is limited to studies that tap a single conceptual distinction, like the distinction between living and nonliving things (Zaitchik & Solomon, 2008) or the distinction between teleological and nonteleological processes (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009).”
Analytic Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief
Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1215647 · Cited by 589
McKay, R., & Whitehouse, H. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038455 · Cited by 353
“Research by Kelemen and colleagues (e.g., Kelemen, 1999a, 1999b, 1999c, 2004) suggests that children display a broad incli- nation to view objects and behaviors of all kinds—including features of the natural world—as existing for a purpose.”
BackgroundThe origins of religious disbelief
Norenzayan, A., & Gervais, W. M. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.006 · Cited by 320
Causal–explanatory pluralism: How intentions, functions, and mechanisms influence causal ascriptions
Lombrozo, T. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.05.002 · Cited by 315
“E-mail address: lombrozo@berkeley.edu Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cognitive Psychology journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/cogpsych sharp because it was honed”), and also by appeal to the knife’s function (‘‘it is sharp because it’s for cutting”).”
BackgroundCognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose
Willard, A. K., & Norenzayan, A. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.016 · Cited by 300
Item feature effects in evolution assessment
Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2010) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20400 · Cited by 239
Gelman, S. A., & Legare, C. H. (2010) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145822 · Cited by 254
“…latter is that children tend to engage in “promiscuous teleology” (reporting that clouds are made for raining, or lions are made for going in a zoo), and adults tend to fall back on teleological explanations when placed under timing constraints and forced to answer quickly (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009).”
BackgroundExplanation and abductive inference
Lombrozo, T. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0014 · Cited by 242
“…such explanations “promiscuously,” as do adults who have not been exposed to alternative scientific explanations (Casler & Kelemen, 2008), who are required to respond under speeded conditions (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009), or who suffer from Alzheimer's disease (Lombrozo, Kelemen, & Zaitchik, 2007).”
BackgroundThe Relation Between Intelligence and Religiosity
Zuckerman, M., Silberman, J., & Hall, J. A. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868313497266 · Cited by 255
“Biases or tendencies of the human mind that support religiosity include misattributions of intent to naturally occurring events (Kelemen, 2004; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009) and belief in disembodied mind as an attribute of supernatural deities (Bering, 2006; Bloom, 2007; Norenzayan, Gervais, &…”
Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition
Blancke, S., Van Breusegem, F., De Jaeger, G., Braeckman, J., & Van Montagu, M. (2015) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011 · Cited by 206
“These intuitions tend to translate in religious beliefs, but they can also contribute to a quasi-religious view on nature [30,31].”
BackgroundCognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution
Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21028 · Cited by 197
“…& Schulz, 2008); (2) teleological biases, the tendency to treat features and actions of category members as existing for some purpose (Kelemen, 2003; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Opfer, 2002; Opfer & Gelman, 2001); and (3) intentionality biases, the tendency to assume that events are directed…”
BackgroundColey, J. D., & Tanner, K. D. (2012) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.12-06-0074 · Cited by 193
“College students were more selective; they rejected teleological explanations for nonliving objects, but 67–81% of them still preferred teleological explanations for biological properties (see also Kelemen and Rossett, 2009).”
Mental simulation and meaning in life.
Waytz, A., Hershfield, H. E., & Tamir, D. I. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038322 · Cited by 176
Brain mechanisms in religion and spirituality: An integrative predictive processing framework
van Elk, M., & Aleman, A. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.031 · Cited by 191
“Several studies have also shown that when skeptics are required to reason under time-pressure, they tend to show similar teleological and intuitive reasoning biases as typically observed in supernatural believers (Kelemen and Rosset, 2009; Svedholm and Lindeman, 2013; Kelemen et al., 2013).”
Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. D. (2015) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-06-0094 · Cited by 190
“Similarly, Kelemen and Rossett (2009) have shown that higher levels of teleological thinking are associated with poorer performance on the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection (Anderson et al., 2002).”
BackgroundExplanatory Preferences Shape Learning and Inference
Lombrozo, T. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.001 · Cited by 229
Young Children’s Learning and Transfer of Biological Information From Picture Books to Real Animals
Ganea, P. A., Ma, L., & DeLoache, J. S. (2011) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01612.x · Cited by 151
“This predisposition to view nonhuman acts as intentional persists into adulthood (Casler & Kelemen, 2008; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Lombrozo, Kelemen, & Zaitchik, 2007).”
BackgroundLindeman, M., & Svedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M. (2012) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027158 · Cited by 147
“For example, Kelemen (2004; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009) characterized children’s tendency for “promiscuous” teleological reasoning in a similar way as Piaget described artificialism, that is, as an intuitive tendency to explain all kinds of natural phenomena by reference to a human-like purpose, such…”
BackgroundSvedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M., & Lindeman, M. (2012) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02118.x · Cited by 146
“Furthermore, unwarranted intentional explanations and animistic attributions of life to artefacts have been shown to be more common among individuals with weaker inhibitory control (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Lombrozo, Kelemen, & Zaitchik, 2007; Zaitchik & Solomon, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialBanerjee, K., & Bloom, P. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.017 · Cited by 129
Lindeman, M., Svedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M., & Lipsanen, J. O. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.008 · Cited by 135
Evaluating everyday explanations
Zemla, J. C., Sloman, S. A., Bechlivanidis, C., & Lagnado, D. A. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1258-z · Cited by 133
Intention Seekers: Conspiracist Ideation and Biased Attributions of Intentionality
Brotherton, R., & French, C. C. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124125 · Cited by 138
“Moreover, adults often readily attribute anthropomorphic intentions to nonhuman animals, or inanimate objects and entities [41,52,53].”
BackgroundInfluentialTesting theories of secularization and religious belief in the Czech Republic and Slovakia
Willard, A. K., & Cingl, L. (2017) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.002 · Cited by 132
Toddlers view artifact function normatively
Casler, K., Terziyan, T., & Greene, K. P. (2009) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.03.005 · Cited by 124
Consistent Belief in a Good True Self in Misanthropes and Three Interdependent Cultures
Freitas, J. D., Sarkissian, H., Newman, G. E., Grossmann, I., Brigard, F. D., Luco, A. C., & Knobe, J. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12505 · Cited by 125
Gervais, W. M. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613489836 · Cited by 127
“Promiscuous teleology persists into adulthood (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009) and may predispose people to become intuitive theists, very likely to infer the presence of a mindful agent behind all the apparent purpose in the world.”
BackgroundThe role of intuitive heuristics in students' thinking: Ranking chemical substances
Maeyer, J. R., & Talanquer, V. (2010) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20397 · Cited by 114
“…biases, first interpretations, and intuitive reasoning often relies on results from tasks Science Education completed under speeded conditions (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Rosset, 2008); it is expected that time limits will impair or constrain the action of control and monitoring mechanisms…”
BackgroundKelemen, D. A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730421.003.0004 · Cited by 112
Self-citationIs inhibition involved in overcoming a common physics misconception in mechanics?
Foisy, L. B., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., & Masson, S. (2015) · Trends in Neuroscience and Education · doi:10.1016/j.tine.2015.03.001 · Cited by 134
Heuristic Reasoning in Chemistry: Making decisions about acid strength
McClary, L., & Talanquer, V. (2010) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.528463 · Cited by 111
“…and intuitive reasoning often relies on results from tasks completed under speeded conditions (Gillard, Van Dooren, Schaeken, & Verschaffel, 2009b; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Rosset, 2008); it is expected that time limits will impair or constrain the action of control and monitoring mechanisms…”
BackgroundOverride the controversy: Analytic thinking predicts endorsement of evolution
Gervais, W. M. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.011 · Cited by 115
MCI theory: a critical discussion
Purzycki, B. G., & Willard, A. K. (2015) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2015.1024915 · Cited by 113
“The biases themselves remain, which is apparent when adults are put under cognitive load (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009), or start to lose some mental abilities in cases of Alzheimer’s (Lombrozo, Kelemen, & Zaitchik, 2007), but we are remarkably capable of fluently processing information that is counter…”
BackgroundPotvin, P., Masson, S., Lafortune, S., & Cyr, G. (2014) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9520-6 · Cited by 111
“…Mellet, Moutier, Pineau, Mazoyer et al. (2000); Dunbar, Fugelsang & Stein (2007); Rossi, Lubin, Lanoë & Pineau (2012); Lubin, Lanoë, Pineau & Rossi (2012); Potvin, Turmel & Masson (2014); Masson, Potvin, Riopel & Brault-Foisy (2014); Kelemen & Rosset (2009) and Kelemen, Rottman & Seston (2012).”
Deus or Darwin: Randomness and belief in theories about the origin of life
Rutjens, B. T., van der Pligt, J., & van Harreveld, F. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.009 · Cited by 97
Anthropomorphizing Science: How Does It Affect the Development of Evolutionary Concepts?
Legare, C. H., Lane, J. D., & Evans, E. M. (2013) · Merrill-palmer Quarterly · doi:10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.59.2.0168 · Cited by 96
Heywood, B. T., & Bering, J. M. (2013) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2013.782888 · Cited by 96
“…to a bias to reason about the natural world teleologically, and that this explanatory bias does not disappear because of advanced education as much as it is overridden by explicitly learned scientific knowledge (see also Kelemen et al., 2005; Kelemen & DiYanni, 2005; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009).”
BackgroundSeeking the supernatural: the Interactive Religious Experience Model
Leeuwen, N. V., & van Elk, M. (2018) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2018.1453529 · Cited by 99
“For instance, following dual-process accounts of religion, a stronger reliance on intuitive thinking should make people more likely to accept agency-intuitions (for related work in this direction, see, for example, research on teleological thinking; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009).”
Biology Undergraduates’ Misconceptions about Genetic Drift
Andrews, T. M., Price, R., Mead, L. S., McElhinny, T. L., Thanukos, A., Perez, K. E., Herreid, C. F., Terry, D. R., & Lemons, P. P. (2012) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.11-12-0107 · Cited by 90
“Indeed, the most tenacious misconception in biology may be the idea that all processes serve a purpose (Gregory, 2009; Kelemen and Rosset, 2009; Mead and Scott, 2010).”
BackgroundThe Role of Teleological Thinking in Learning the Darwinian Model of Evolution
Galli, L. G., & Meinardi, E. N. (2010) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1007/s12052-010-0272-7 · Cited by 90
“Many people appear to have conceptions of this kind (Kelemen and Rosset 2009).”
Mind attribution is for morality
Young, L., & Waytz, A. G. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692972.003.0006 · Cited by 88
Kelemen, D. A. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619827011 · Cited by 96
“…nontimed counterparts to endorse scientifically inaccurate teleological statements about living and nonliving natural phenomena, some of which are directly relevant to evolution (e.g., “the fittest animals survive so that species can grow stronger”; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Rottman et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLearning the Language of Evolution: Lexical Ambiguity and Word Meaning in Student Explanations
Rector, M. A., Nehm, R. H., & Pearl, D. K. (2012) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9296-z · Cited by 86
The Chronic Dependence of Popular Religiosity upon Dysfunctional Psychosociological Conditions
Paul, G. S. (2009) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470490900700305 · Cited by 86
“…or related groups, and “memes” that spread religious ideas like viral infections even if religious devotion is maladaptive to a given individual or group (Bloom, 2007; Boyer, 2008; Dawkins, 2006; Dennett, 2006; Fincher and Thornhill, 2008; Inzlicht et al., 2009; Kelemen and Rosset, 2009).”
BackgroundPriming of supernatural agent concepts and agency detection
van Elk, M., Rutjens, B. T., van der Pligt, J., & van Harreveld, F. (2014) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2014.933444 · Cited by 89
“…agents may modulate the detection of faces fits well with Guthrie ’ s proposal that belief in supernatural agents is related to pareidolia-like perceptual biases (Guthrie, 1980, 1993), rather than the attribution of intentions to physical objects (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Kelemen et al., 2013).”
The Free-Will Intuitions Scale and the question of natural compatibilism
Deery, O., Davis, T., & Carey, J. (2014) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2014.893868 · Cited by 84
“…everyday uses of ‘fatalism’ seem to express the idea that there is an underlying teleology to the way in which some events unfold, and we wondered whether there was anything more to the folk notion of fatalism than what some psychologists call “promiscuous teleology” (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009).”
BackgroundWhat Do Experts and Novices “See” in Evolutionary Problems?
Nehm, R. H., & Ridgway, J. S. (2011) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1007/s12052-011-0369-7 · Cited by 84
Ha, M., Nehm, R. H., Urban‐Lurain, M., & MERRILL, J. E. (2011) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.11-08-0081 · Cited by 83
“One major advance in our understanding of student learning is that learners do not progress directly from novice to expert levels; rather, the pathways of knowledge growth in biology (and other domains) are highly inefficient and involve integrating scientific ideas into naı̈ve knowledge frameworks, generating heterog…”
BackgroundExploring Dominant Types of Explanations Built by General Chemistry Students
Talanquer, V. (2009) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690903369662 · Cited by 83
“Understanding the evolution of each of these explanatory stances with development and learning is of central interest in cognitive and developmental psychology, as well as in science education (Griffin & Baron‐Cohen, 2002 ; Grotzer, 2003 ; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009 ; Lombrozo & Carey, 2006 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialNot So Fast: Reassessing Gender Essentialism in Young Adults
Eidson, R. C., & Coley, J. D. (2013) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2013.763810 · Cited by 82
“However, Kelemen and Rosset (2009) found that undergraduates endorse more scientifically spurious teleological explanations for natural phenomena (e.g., ‘‘the sun makes light so that plants can photosynthesize’’) when under time pressure than when allowed to respond at their own pace.”
BackgroundAsking the right questions about the psychology of human inquiry: Nine open challenges
Coenen, A., Nelson, J. D., & Gureckis, T. M. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1470-5 · Cited by 84
Making predictions about chemical reactivity: Assumptions and heuristics
Maeyer, J. R., & Talanquer, V. (2013) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21092 · Cited by 74
What makes weird beliefs thrive? The epidemiology of pseudoscience
Boudry, M., Blancke, S., & Pigliucci, M. (2014) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2014.971946 · Cited by 72
“Moreover, the creative power of blind selection also conflicts with our teleological intuitions about functional complexity and our intuitive design stance (De Cruz & De Smedt, 2010; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Reiss, 2009).”
BackgroundCognitive flexibility and religious disbelief
Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., Zmigrod, S., & Robbins, T. W. (2018) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1034-3 · Cited by 76
“There is a range of human cognitive biases that are thought to make children and adults “intuitive theists” (Järnefelt, Canfield, & Kelemen, 2015; Kelemen, 2004; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009).”
BackgroundCognitive load increases anthropomorphism of humanoid robot. The automatic path of anthropomorphism
Spatola, N., & Chaminade, T. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102884 · Cited by 68
Folk Mereology is Teleological
Rosé, D., & Schaffer, J. (2015) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12123 · Cited by 72
This mechanistic step is “ productive ”: organic chemistry students' backward-oriented reasoning
Caspari‐Gnann, I., Weinrich, M., Sevian, H., & Graulich, N. (2017) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c7rp00124j · Cited by 68
Coley, J. D., Arenson, M. B., Xu, Y., & Tanner, K. D. (2016) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.001 · Cited by 70
“…college years may underlie systems of biological misconceptions, namely inaccurate biological reasoning that may cross disparate topic areas such as physiology, evolution, and molecular biology, yet have in common threads of teleological reasoning (Coley & Tanner, 2015; Kelemen & Rossett, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialEmmons, N. A., Haggerty, K. L., & Kelemen, D. A. (2017) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21421 · Cited by 76
“…of formal instruction since, consistent with dual processing or conceptual coexistence accounts (e.g., Evans & Stanovich, 2013; Kahneman, 2011; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Shtulman & Valcarcel, 2012; see also Legare, Evans, Rosengren, & Harris, 2012), even highly educated adults such as…”
BackgroundSelf-citationSchachner, A., Zhu, L., Li, J., & Kelemen, D. A. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.12.006 · Cited by 66
“In contrast, when teleological explanations are used to explain the properties of natural objects, they are often explicitly judged as incorrect by adults and viewed as scientifically unwarranted (Kelemen, 1999a, 1999b, 1999c, 2003; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationTalanquer, V. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed400311x · Cited by 70
Normative Judgments and Individual Essence
Freitas, J. D., Tobia, K. P., Newman, G. E., & Knobe, J. (2016) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12364 · Cited by 64
“28 of a fork is to help in eating), but research suggests people apply teleology more broadly (Kelemen, 1999; Kelemen and Rosset, 2009).”
BackgroundJärnefelt, E., Canfield, C. F., & Kelemen, D. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.005 · Cited by 133
Self-citationVarella, M. A. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01839 · Cited by 66
“Adults with poor inhibitory control in timeconstrained contexts tend to broadly explain living and nonliving natural phenomena by reference to a purpose (Kelemen and Rosset, 2009).”
BackgroundCultural influences on the teleological stance: evidence from China
Rottman, J., Zhu, L., Wang, W., Schillaci, R. S., Clark, K. J., & Kelemen, D. A. (2016) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2015.1118402 · Cited by 66
“First, unlike other highly secular countries like Denmark and Sweden (Zuckerman, 2008), which share Greek and Abrahamic philosophical traditions with the other Western societies in which the teleological bias has previously been uncovered, China has an intellectual inheritance that is primarily rooted in Confucianism,…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationExplanation and inference: mechanistic and functional explanations guide property generalization
Lombrozo, T., & Gwynne, N. Z. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00700 · Cited by 60
Potvin, P. (2013) · Neuroeducation · doi:10.24046/neuroed.20130201.16 · Cited by 61
McCauley, R. N. (2020) · Zygon® · doi:10.1111/zygo.12573 · Cited by 63
Hearing Voices and Other Matters of the Mind
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.001.0001 · Cited by 70
Queloz, A. C., Klymkowsky, M. W., Stern, E., Hafen, E., & Köhler, K. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176906 · Cited by 61
Human foibles or systemic failure—Lay perceptions of the 2008–2009 financial crisis
Leiser, D., Bourgeois‐Gironde, S., & Benita, R. (2010) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2010.02.013 · Cited by 56
Norenzayan, A. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033426 · Cited by 62
Emmons, N. A., Smith, H., & Kelemen, D. A. (2016) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409289.2016.1169823 · Cited by 54
“…coherent to effectively challenge them, children’s untaught intuitions can become long-term obstacles to elaborating a scientifically accurate understanding of adaptation (see Järnefelt, Canfield, & Kelemen, 2015, and Kelemen & Rosset, 2009, for more on this dual processing perspective).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWilson, M., Bulbulia, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2013) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2013.779934 · Cited by 52
“Several studies suggest that even selfprofessed atheists harbor implicit forms of supernatural cognition (Bering, 2006; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009).”
BackgroundChallenging Cognitive Construals: A Dynamic Alternative to Stable Misconceptions
Gouvea, J. S., & Simon, M. R. (2018) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-10-0214 · Cited by 53
“This argument is represented most strongly by Kelemen’s “promiscuous teleology” hypotheses (Kelemen, 1999b; Kelemen and Rosset, 2009).”
Where Philosophical Intuitions Come From
Cruz, H. D. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2014.967792 · Cited by 49
“, ‘The sun radiates heat to nurture life on earth’ [Kelemen and Rosset 2009].”
BackgroundNehm, R. H. (2019) · Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research · doi:10.1186/s43031-019-0017-6 · Cited by 47
“A productive trend in BER involves efforts to link cognitive perspectives developed in other fields (e.g., education, psychology) with discipline-specific challenges characteristic of teaching and learning about living systems (Inagaki and Hatano, 1991; Kelemen and Rosset 2009).”
BackgroundKim, J. J. H., Betz, N., Helmuth, B. S. T., & Coley, J. D. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12653 · Cited by 50
The Development of Children's Prelife Reasoning: Evidence From Two Cultures
Emmons, N. A., & Kelemen, D. (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12220 · Cited by 46
“…urban 11-to 12-year-olds (33% of rural 11-to 12-year-olds) continued to reason that at least one of their capacities functioned during prelife (see Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Kelemen et al., 2012; Legare, Evans, Rosengren, & Harris, 2012; Legare & Gelman, 2008; Shtulman & Valcarcel, 2012, for…”
Self-citationShtulman, A., & Legare, C. H. (2019) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12483 · Cited by 53
“…manifests itself as differences in how quickly and how accurately people verify scientific ideas that are consistent with folk explanations relative to those that are inconsistent with them (Goldberg & Thompson-Schill, 2009; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Potvin & Cyr, 2017; Shtulman & Val-carcel, 2012).”
BackgroundDoes Poor Understanding of Physical World Predict Religious and Paranormal Beliefs?
Lindeman, M., & Svedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M. (2016) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3248 · Cited by 54
“…and supernatural beliefs agrees with previous findings obtained in studies on anthropomorphism (Purzycki et al., 2012; Shtulman, 2008), promiscuous teleology (Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Kelemen et al., 2013), and core ontological confusions (Barber, 2014; Lindeman et al., 2015; Lobato et al., 2014).”
Non‐Scientific Criteria for Belief Sustain Counter‐Scientific Beliefs
Metz, S. E., Weisberg, D. S., & Weisberg, M. (2018) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12584 · Cited by 45
Rosé, D., & Nichols, S. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12725 · Cited by 45
“For instance, Malt (1994) finds that people say that tea is 91% H2O but not water and that pool water is 81.”
BackgroundExploring Mechanistic Reasoning in Chemistry
Talanquer, V. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5149-4_3 · Cited by 45
Neuroscientific Prediction and the Intrusion of Intuitive Metaphysics
Rosé, D., Buckwalter, W., & Nichols, S. (2015) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12310 · Cited by 41
“This default perspective on reality is not entirely displaced with a more mature, scientifically informed perspective on the world but rather is masked in adulthood (e.g., Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Kelemen, Rottman & Seston, 2013; Lombrozo, Kelemen & Zaitchik, 2007).”
Cognitive Pathways to Belief in Karma and Belief in God
White, C., Willard, A. K., Baimel, A., & Norenzayan, A. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12935 · Cited by 47
Student Misconceptions about Plants – A First Step in Building a Teaching Resource
Wynn, A. N., Pan, I. L., Rueschhoff, E. E., Herman, M., & Archer, E. (2017) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1253 · Cited by 40
“Kelemen and Rossett demonstrated that teleological thinking persists in adults, who continue to invoke causal explanations for what they observe in the natural world (19).”
BackgroundRichard, M., Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. D. (2017) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-11-0317 · Cited by 40
“Adults and professional scientists may maintain intuitive reasoning frameworks, and while scientific education can allow accurate explanations to outweigh intuitive ones, intuitive reasoning itself is deeply rooted and persistent (Kelemen and Rosset, 2009; Shtulman and Valcarcel, 2012; Shtulman and Harrington, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialRonfard, S., Brown, S. A., Doncaster, E., & Kelemen, D. A. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104635 · Cited by 43
Self-citationStudents’ Mental Models of Evolutionary Causation: Natural Selection and Genetic Drift
Beggrow, E. P., & Nehm, R. H. (2012) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1007/s12052-012-0432-z · Cited by 39
“Researchers have documented the persistence of naive ideas, while new, accurate scientific concepts are added to naive “knowledge” frameworks (Vosniadou et al. 2008; Kelemen and Rosset 2009; Nehm 2010).”
BackgroundRethinking Autism, Theism, and Atheism
Visuri, I. (2018) · Archive for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1163/15736121-12341348 · Cited by 41
Biological Teleology: The Need for History
Lennox, J. G., & Kampourakis, K. (2013) · History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6537-5_20 · Cited by 39
Blancke, S., De Smedt, J., De Cruz, H., Boudry, M., & Braeckman, J. (2012) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9402-z · Cited by 39
“Similarly, in speeded judgment tasks, where schooled adults have to choose very quickly between teleological and non-teleological explanations, they too show an increased tendency to reason teleologically (Kelemen and Rosset 2009).”
BackgroundThe coexistence claim and its possible implications for success in teaching for conceptual “change”
Potvin, P. (2017) · European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.30935/scimath/9497 · Cited by 40
Core Intuitions About Persons Coexist and Interfere With Acquired Christian Beliefs About God
Barlev, M., Mermelstein, S., & German, T. C. (2016) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12435 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kelemen, Deborah
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 138-143
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073307787
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 141.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- teleological reasoning, implicit reasoning, scientific literacy, religious beliefs, inhibitory control, scientific knowledge, explanation evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Reading, Religion, Intuition, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review