The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633 · Cited by 2,875
Guilt: An interpersonal approach
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.243 · Cited by 1,884 · cited 2×
“, I hurt you; you hurt me) (Baumeister et al., 1994; Kedia et al., 2008).”
BackgroundRai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0021867 · Cited by 887
Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe
Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x · Cited by 851
Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309353415 · Cited by 842 · cited 5×
“Intent may play different roles in the domains of fairness, in-group loyalty, and respect for authority (Graham & Haidt, 2010; Haidt, 2007; Rozin et al., 1999), as well as for norms that may be inextricably linked to intent, such as norms against dishonesty (Greene & Paxton, 2009; Mazar, Amir, &…”
InfluentialCauses and consequences of mind perception
Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., & Wegner, D. M. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.006 · Cited by 759
The architecture of human kin detection
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05510 · Cited by 748
The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment
Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Saxe, R. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701408104 · Cited by 625 · cited 2×
“judgments would be observed among Western adults, who typically treat intent as the primary factor in moral judgments of harm violations (Cushman, 2008; Mikhail, 2007; Young et al., 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality
Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2012.651387 · Cited by 1,008
Self-citationDodell-Feder, D., Lincoln, S. H., Coulson, J. P., & Hooker, C. I. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081279 · Cited by 155
Bregant, J., Wellbery, I., & Shaw, A. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.019 · Cited by 36
Wheeler, M. A., & Laham, S. M. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216653374 · Cited by 27
Laurin, K., & Plaks, J. E. (2014) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614534698 · Cited by 24
Principles of moral accounting: How our intuitive moral sense balances rights and wrongs
Johnson, S. G. B., & Ahn, J. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104467 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, L., & Saxe, R.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202-214
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161283553
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 7.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
