Cited by 762Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentSocial Robot Interaction and HRISocial and Intergroup Psychology

Causes and consequences of mind perception

Waytz, Adam, Gray, Kurt, Epley, Nicholas, Wegner, Daniel M.·2010·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Perceiving others' minds is a crucial component of social life. People do not, however, always ascribe minds to other people, and sometimes ascribe minds to non-people (e.g. God, gadgets). This article reviews when mind perception occurs, when it does not, and why mind perception is important. Causes of mind perception stem both from the perceiver and perceived, and include the need for social connection (perceiver) and a similarity to oneself (perceived). Mind perception also has profound consequences for both the perceiver and perceived. Ascribing mind confers an entity moral rights and also makes its actions meaningful. Understanding the causes and consequences of mind perception can explain when this most social of cognitive skills will be used, and why it matters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.006

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mental state attributions to various agents have a two-dimensional structure distinguishing between 'Experience' and 'Agency'.

    “Other work has systematically explored the dimensions underlying mental state attributions to various agents, revealing a two-dimensional structure distinguishing between ‘Experience’ (i.e. the capacity to feel pain, fear, joy, or pride) and ‘Agency’ (i.e. the capacity to have self-control, morality, planning, or communication) that is reminiscent of the distinction between phenomenal and non-phen”

    From Folk psychological attributions of consciousness to large language models (2024) · cites this paper as Waytz et al. 2010

  • As a potential mechanism of emotional regulation, particularly in facing the challenges brought by mortality salience, anthropomorphic design provides emotional comfort and support.

    “As a potential mechanism of emotional regulation, particularly in facing the challenges brought by mortality salience, it provides emotional comfort and support [26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., & Wegner, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Waytz, Adam
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
383-388
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164318031
Cited by
759
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
mind perception, mind attribution, social cognition, social connectedness, self-similarity, moral rights, meaning of action, anthropomorphism, person perception
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Models, Psychological, Perception, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review