Cited by 96Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliverySurfactants and Colloidal SystemsAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

Molecular implications in the nanoencapsulation of the anti-tuberculosis drug rifampicin within flower-like polymeric micelles

Moretton, Marcela A., Glisoni, Romina J., Chiappetta, Diego A., Sosnik, Alejandro·2010·Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is the second most deadly infectious disease behind the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). An effective pharmacotherapy has been available for more than 5 decades. However, the length of the treatment and the pill burden result in low patient compliance and adherence to the regimens. Nanotechnologies can overcome these basic technological drawbacks. The present work explored the molecular implications governing the encapsulation and water solubilization of RIF within flower-like micelles of poly(epsilon-caprolactone)-b-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL-PEG-PCL) block copolymers. Ten derivatives of different molecular weight and hydrophobic/hydrophilic caprolactone/ethylene oxide ratio (CL/EO) were synthesized by a fast and high-yield Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis (MAPS) technique; CL/EO values are determined by taking the ratios of the number of repeating units in the PCL and the PEG segments. The aggregation behavior of the copolymers was thoroughly investigated by means of surface tension (critical micellar concentration), dynamic light scattering (size, size distribution and zeta potential) and transmission electron microscopy (morphology). In general, the greater the central PEG segment, the larger the micelles formed. The physical stability was intimately associated with the molecular weight and the composition. Then, the encapsulation of RIF in the different copolymer families was evaluated, and the physical stability of the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.05.016

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moretton, M. A., Glisoni, R. J., Chiappetta, D. A., & Sosnik, A.
Affiliations
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Sosnik, Alejandro
Venue
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
467-479
ISSN
0927-7765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972528605
Cited by
96
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
rifampicin, nanoencapsulation, flower-like micelles, polymeric micelles, polycaprolactone, polyethylene glycol, tuberculosis, drug solubilization, critical micelle concentration, micelle size, molecular weight effects, physical stability, drug delivery
MeSH terms
Antitubercular Agents, Calorimetry, Differential Scanning, Micelles, Particle Size, Polyesters, Polyethylene Glycols, Rifampin, Solubility, Temperature, Water, Nanotechnology, Nanostructures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review