Cited by 3Radiation Therapy and DosimetryNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsNanocluster Synthesis and Applications

Enhancing radiosensitization in triple-negative breast cancer by aptamer-modified nanoclusters NC-T5-5TR1

Kan, Xuechun, Wang, Jifei, Li, Yan, Li, Dongdong, Li, Fan, Huang, Cheng, Liu, Peidang·2026·Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

Abstract

Radiotherapy is an important part of standard treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); however, radioresistance significantly limits therapeutic outcomes. In this study, we developed a novel radiosensitizer based on aptamer-modified silver nanoclusters, NC-T5-5TR1, to potentiate radiotherapy efficacy against TNBC. NC-T5-5TR1 enabled real-time tumor imaging and accurate localization via their intrinsic fluorescence and targeting capability. When combined with ionizing radiation (IR), NC-T5-5TR1 significantly enhanced radiosensitization in vitro, as evidenced by decreased proliferation, increased apoptosis and higher reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and also markedly inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Transcriptomic analysis indicated that the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway was downregulated under NC-T5-5TR1 + IR treatment, which was subsequently validated in vitro and in vivo. Rescue experiments confirmed that IL-6 overexpression reversed NC-T5-5TR1 combined with IR-induced JAK2/STAT3 inhibition and its downstream effects on proliferation, apoptosis, and ROS accumulation. Collectively, our findings demonstrated that NC-T5-5TR1 enhanced the radiosensitivity of TNBC cells, and this effect was associated with the modulation of the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 axis, offering a promising strategy for improving the therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy in TNBC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.115397

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kan, X., Wang, J., Li, Y., Li, D., Li, F., Huang, C., & Liu, P.
Affiliations
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Peidang
Venue
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-04
Volume
260
Pages
115397
ISSN
0927-7765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7117108211
Cited by
3
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771980, 81571805)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications
Keywords
triple-negative breast cancer, radiosensitization, silver nanoclusters, radioresistance (biology), IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling, reactive oxygen species, apoptosis, tumor imaging, ionizing radiation, combination therapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Nude, Radiation-Sensitizing Agents, Radiation, Ionizing, Silver, Signal Transduction, Interleukin-6, Apoptosis, Reactive Oxygen Species, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Mice, Aptamers, Nucleotide, Janus Kinase 2, Metal Nanoparticles, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review