Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A gap analysis of Internet-of-Things platforms

Open access
Mineraud, Julien, Mazhelis, Oleksiy, Su, Xiang, Tarkoma, Sasu·2016·Computer Communications
DOI 10.1016/j.comcom.2016.03.015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comcom.2016.03.015

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Borgia, 2014, The internet of things vision: Key features, applications and open issues, Comput. Commun., 54, 1, 10.1016/j.comcom.2014.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Atzori, 2010, The internet of things: a survey, Comput. Netw., 54, 2787, 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Tarkoma, 2013, The Internet of Things program: the Finnish perspective, IEEE Commun. Mag., 51, 10, 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6476854 · doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6476854
  4. Kim, 2014, M2M service platforms: survey, issues, and enabling technologies, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 16, 61, 10.1109/SURV.2013.100713.00203 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Economides, 2006, Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry, Manag. Sci., 52, 1057, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0549 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Qin, 2011, Data fusion in the internet of things, Proc. Eng., 15, 3023, 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.567 · DOI
  7. Villaverde, 2014, Service discovery protocols for constrained machine-to-machine communications, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 16, 41, 10.1109/SURV.2013.102213.00229 · DOI
  8. Yan, 2014, A survey on trust management for internet of things, J. Netw. Comput. Appl., 42, 120, 10.1016/j.jnca.2014.01.014 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Roman, 2011, Securing the Internet of Things, Computer, 44, 51, 10.1109/MC.2011.291 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Roman, 2013, On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed internet of things, Comput. Netw., 57, 2266, 10.1016/j.comnet.2012.12.018 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Bormann, 2012, CoAP: an application protocol for billions of tiny internet nodes, IEEE Internet Comput., 16, 62, 10.1109/MIC.2012.29 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gubbi, 2013, Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 29, 1645, 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Su, 2015, Adding semantics to internet of things, Concurr. Comput.: Pract. Exp., 27, 1844, 10.1002/cpe.3203 · DOI
  14. He, 2012, A smart web service based on the context of things, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 11, 13:1, 10.1145/2078316.2078321 · doi:10.1145/2078316.2078321
  15. Gawer, 2012, How companies become platform leaders, MIT/Sloan Manag. Rev., 49

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mineraud, J., Mazhelis, O., Su, X., & Tarkoma, S.
Venue
Computer Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
89-90
Pages
5-16
ISSN
0140-3664 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.comcom.2016.03.015
OpenAlex
W1859184552
Cited by
439
References
2
FWCI
63.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.