The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A gap analysis of Internet-of-Things platforms
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data Mining for Internet of Things: A Survey
Tsai, C.-W., Lai, C.-F., Chiang, M.-C., & Yang, L. T. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.103013.00206 · Cited by 620
IETF Standardization in the Field of the Internet of Things (IoT): A Survey
Ishaq, I., Carels, D., Teklemariam, G., Hoebeke, J., Abeele, F., Poorter, E., Moerman, I., & Demeester, P. (2013) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan2020235 · Cited by 226
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Borgia, 2014, The internet of things vision: Key features, applications and open issues, Comput. Commun., 54, 1, 10.1016/j.comcom.2014.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Atzori, 2010, The internet of things: a survey, Comput. Netw., 54, 2787, 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
- Tarkoma, 2013, The Internet of Things program: the Finnish perspective, IEEE Commun. Mag., 51, 10, 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6476854 · doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6476854
- Kim, 2014, M2M service platforms: survey, issues, and enabling technologies, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 16, 61, 10.1109/SURV.2013.100713.00203 · DOI · Paper page
- Economides, 2006, Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry, Manag. Sci., 52, 1057, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0549 · DOI · Paper page
- Qin, 2011, Data fusion in the internet of things, Proc. Eng., 15, 3023, 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.567 · DOI
- Villaverde, 2014, Service discovery protocols for constrained machine-to-machine communications, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 16, 41, 10.1109/SURV.2013.102213.00229 · DOI
- Yan, 2014, A survey on trust management for internet of things, J. Netw. Comput. Appl., 42, 120, 10.1016/j.jnca.2014.01.014 · DOI · Paper page
- Roman, 2011, Securing the Internet of Things, Computer, 44, 51, 10.1109/MC.2011.291 · DOI · Paper page
- Roman, 2013, On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed internet of things, Comput. Netw., 57, 2266, 10.1016/j.comnet.2012.12.018 · DOI · Paper page
- Bormann, 2012, CoAP: an application protocol for billions of tiny internet nodes, IEEE Internet Comput., 16, 62, 10.1109/MIC.2012.29 · DOI · Paper page
- Gubbi, 2013, Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 29, 1645, 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
- Su, 2015, Adding semantics to internet of things, Concurr. Comput.: Pract. Exp., 27, 1844, 10.1002/cpe.3203 · DOI
- He, 2012, A smart web service based on the context of things, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 11, 13:1, 10.1145/2078316.2078321 · doi:10.1145/2078316.2078321
- Gawer, 2012, How companies become platform leaders, MIT/Sloan Manag. Rev., 49
Cited by
Verma, S., Kawamoto, Y., Fadlullah, Z. M., Nishiyama, H., & Kato, N. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2694469 · Cited by 422
A Survey on Emerging SDN and NFV Security Mechanisms for IoT Systems
Farris, I., Taleb, T., Khettab, Y., & Song, J. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2862350 · Cited by 402
Reka, S. S., & Dragicevic, T. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.089 · Cited by 304
Semantic reasoning for context-aware internet of things applications
Maarala, A. I., Su, X., & Riekki, J. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2016.2587060 · Cited by 141
Self-citationRahman, H., & Hussain, M. I. (2020) · Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · doi:10.1002/ett.3902 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Mineraud, J., Mazhelis, O., Su, X., & Tarkoma, S.
- Venue
- Computer Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 89-90
- Pages
- 5-16
- ISSN
- 0140-3664 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1859184552
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 63.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
