Cited by 458CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsCatalysts for Methane ReformingElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

Atomistic Mechanisms Underlying Selectivities in C1 and C2 Products from Electrochemical Reduction of CO on Cu(111)

Open access
Xiao, Hai, Cheng, Tao, Goddard, William A.·2017·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Practical environmental and energy applications of the electrochemical reduction of CO 2 to chemicals and fuels require far more efficient and selective electrocatalysts beyond the only working material Cu, but the wealth of experimental data on Cu can serve to validate any proposed mechanisms. To provide design guidelines, we use quantum mechanics to predict the detailed atomistic mechanisms responsible for C 1 and C 2 products on Cu. Thus, we report the pH dependent routes to the major products, methane and ethylene, and identify the key intermediates where branches to methanol, ketene, ethanol, acetylene, and ethane are kinetically blocked. We discovered that surface water on Cu plays a key role in the selectivity for hydrocarbon products over the oxygen-containing alcohol products by serving as a strong proton donor for electrochemical dehydration reductions. We suggest new experiments to validate our predicted mechanisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.6b06846

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Zhu, D. D.; Liu, J. L.; Qiao, S. Z. Adv Mater 2016, 28, 3423.
  2. Hori, Y.; Kikuchi, K.; Suzuki, S. Chem. Lett. 1985, 14, 1695.
  3. Hori, Y.; Wakebe, H.; Tsukamoto, T.; Koga, O. Elec- trochim. Acta 1994, 39, 1833.
  4. Gattrell, M.; Gupta, N.; Co, A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2006, 594, 1.
  5. Kuhl, K. P.; Cave, E. R.; Abram, D. N.; Jaramillo, T. F. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7050.
  6. Kuhl, K. P.; Hatsukade, T.; Cave, E. R.; Abram, D. N.; Kibsgaard, J.; Jaramillo, T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14107.
  7. Hori, Y.; Murata, A.; Takahashi, R.; Suzuki, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5022.
  8. Hori, Y.; Takahashi, R.; Yoshinami, Y.; Murata, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 7075.
  9. Hori, Y.; Takahashi, I.; Koga, O.; Hoshi, N., J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2003, 199, 39.
  10. Kim, Y.-G.; Javier, A.; Baricuatro, J. H.; Torelli, D.; Cummins, K. D.; Tsang, C. F.; Hemminger, J. C.; Soriaga, M. P., J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 780, 290.
  11. Peterson, A. A.; Abild-Pedersen, F.; Studt, F.; Rossmeisl, J.; Norskov, J. K. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1311.
  12. Calle-Vallejo, F.; Koper, M. T. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7282.
  13. Nie, X.; Esopi, M. R.; Janik, M. J.; Asthagiri, A. An- gew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2459.
  14. Nie, X.; Luo, W.; Janik, M. J.; Asthagiri, A. J. Catal. 2014, 312, 108.
  15. Montoya, J. H.; Shi, C.; Chan, K.; Nørskov, J. K. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 2032.
  16. Cheng, T.; Xiao, H.; Goddard, W. A. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 4767.
  17. Xiao, H.; Cheng, T.; Goddard, W. A.; Sundararaman, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 483.
  18. Goodpaster, J. D.; Bell, A. T.; Head-Gordon, M. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 1471.
  19. Schouten, K. J. P.; Kwon, Y.; van der Ham, C. J. M.; Qin, Z.; Koper, M. T. M. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1902.
  20. Roberts, F. S.; Kuhl, K. P.; Nilsson, A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 5179.
  21. Petrosyan, S. A.; Rigos, A. A.; Arias, T. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 15436.
  22. Sundararaman, R.; Goddard, W. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 064107.
  23. Letchworth-Weaver, K.; Arias, T. A. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 075140.
  24. Schouten, K. J. P.; Qin, Z.; Gallent, E. P.; Koper, M. T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9864.
  25. Schouten, K. J. P.; Pérez Gallent, E.; Koper, M. T. M. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2014, 716, 53.
  26. Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 558.
  27. Kresse, G.; Furthmuller, J. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6, 15.
  28. Kresse, G.; Furthmuller, J. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169.
  29. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865.
  30. Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758.
  31. Henkelman, G.; Uberuaga, B. P.; Jónsson, H. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 9901.
  32. Henkelman, G.; Jónsson, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 7010.
  33. Bertie, J. E.; Whalley, E. J. Chem. Phys. 1967, 46, 1271.
  34. Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Bowman, J. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 10046.
  35. Zhao, M.; Anderson, A. B. Electrochem. Commun. 2016, 69, 64.
  36. Garrity, K. F.; Bennett, J. W.; Rabe, K. M.; Vanderbilt, D. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2014, 81, 446.
  37. Arias, T. A.; Payne, M. C.; Joannopoulos, J. D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 69, 1077.
  38. Freysoldt, C.; Boeck, S.; Neugebauer, J. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 241103.
  39. Li, C. W.; Kanan, M. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 7231.
  40. Ma, M.; Djanashvili, K.; Smith, W. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6680.
  41. Dutta, A.; Rahaman, M.; Luedi, N. C.; Mohos, M.; Broekmann, P. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 3804.
  42. Javier, A.; Chmielowiec, B.; Sanabria-Chinchilla, J.; Kim, Y.-G.; Baricuatro, J. H.; Soriaga, M. P. Electrocatalysis 2015, 6, 127.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiao, H., Cheng, T., & Goddard, W. A.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Goddard, William A.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2016-12-21
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
130-136
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2560832335
Cited by
458
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Office of Science (DE-SC0004993)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Keywords
electrochemical CO2 reduction, copper electrocatalysts, Cu(111), reaction mechanism, product selectivity, methane, ethylene, surface water, proton transfer, methanol, ketenes, ethanol, acetylene, ethane, pH dependence, quantum chemical calculations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review