The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IoT survey: An SDN and fog computing perspective
Abstract
Abstract Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the Internet of Things (IoT). While some analysts disvalue the IoT hype, several technology leaders, governments, and researchers are putting serious efforts to develop solutions enabling wide IoT deployment. Thus, the huge amount of generated data, the high network scale, the security and privacy concerns, the new requirements in terms of QoS, and the heterogeneity in this ubiquitous network of networks make its implementation a very challenging task. SDN, a new networking paradigm, has revealed its usefulness in reducing the management complexities in today's networks. Additionally, SDN, having a global view of the network, has presented effective security solutions. On the other hand, fog computing, a new data service platform, consists of pushing the data to the network edge reducing the cost (in terms of bandwidth consumption and high latency) of “big data” transportation through the core network. In this paper, we critically review the SDN and fog computing-based solutions to overcome the IoT main challenges, highlighting their advantages, and exposing their weaknesses. Thus, we make recommendations at the end of this paper for the upcoming research work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2444095 · Cited by 8,630
Fog computing and its role in the internet of things
Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., & Addepalli, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing · doi:10.1145/2342509.2342513 · Cited by 6,244
A Survey on Mobile Edge Computing: The Communication Perspective
Mao, Y., You, C., Zhang, J., Huang, K., & Letaief, K. B. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2745201 · Cited by 5,607
The case for vm-based cloudlets in mobile computing
Satyanarayanan, M., Bahl, P., Caceres, R., & Davies, N. (2009) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2009.82 · Cited by 3,660
The emergence of edge computing
Satyanarayanan, M. (2017) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2017.9 · Cited by 2,832
Fog Computing: A Platform for Internet of Things and Analytics
Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Natarajan, P., & Zhu, J. (2014) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05029-4_7 · Cited by 1,222
Future Edge Cloud and Edge Computing for Internet of Things Applications
Pan, J., & McElhannon, J. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2767608 · Cited by 868
A Software Defined Fog Node Based Distributed Blockchain Cloud Architecture for IoT
Sharma, P. K., Chen, M.-Y., & Park, J. H. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2757955 · Cited by 676
Internet of Things Architecture: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, Requirements, and Open Challenges
Yaqoob, I., Ahmed, E., Hashem, I. A. T., Ahmed, A. I. A., Gani, A., Imran, M., & Guizani, M. (2017) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2017.1600421 · Cited by 668
Securing Fog Computing for Internet of Things Applications: Challenges and Solutions
Ni, J., Zhang, K., Lin, X., & Shen, X. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2762345 · Cited by 659
Cited by
Security analysis of drones systems: Attacks, limitations, and recommendations
Yaacoub, J.-P., Noura, H., Salman, O., & Chehab, A. (2020) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2020.100218 · Cited by 727
Self-citationEdge-computing-driven Internet of Things: A Survey
Kong, L., Tan, J., Huang, J., Chen, G., Wang, S., Jin, X., Zeng, P., Khan, M., & Das, S. K. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3555308 · Cited by 396
Iqbal, W., Abbas, H., Daneshmand, M., Rauf, B., & Bangash, Y. A. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2997651 · Cited by 356
Detection and Mitigation of DoS and DDoS Attacks in IoT-Based Stateful SDN: An Experimental Approach
Galeano-Brajones, J., Carmona-Murillo, J., Valenzuela-Valdés, J. F., & Luna-Valero, F. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20030816 · Cited by 165
LoRaWAN security survey: Issues, threats and possible mitigation techniques
Noura, H., Hatoum, T., Salman, O., Yaacoub, J.-P., & Chehab, A. (2020) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2020.100303 · Cited by 137
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Salman, O., Elhajj, I., Chehab, A., & Kayssi, A.
- Venue
- Computer Networks
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 143
- Pages
- 221-246
- ISSN
- 1389-1286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2885007481
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 16.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IoT survey: An SDN and fog computing perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.020
- The paper
- Salman, O., Elhajj, I., Chehab, A., & Kayssi, A. (2018). IoT survey: An SDN and fog computing perspective. Computer Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
