Cited by 69Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringECG Monitoring and AnalysisHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Modeling of the photoplethysmogram during atrial fibrillation

Sološenko, Andrius, Petrėnas, Andrius, Marozas, Vaidotas, Sörnmo, Leif·2017·Computers in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

A phenomenological model for simulating the photoplethysmogram (PPG) during atrial fibrillation (AF) is proposed. The simulated PPG is solely based on RR interval information, and, therefore, any annotated ECG database can be used to model sinus rhythm, AF, or rhythms with premature beats. A PPG pulse is modeled by a linear combination of a log-normal and two Gaussian waveforms. The model PPG is obtained by placing individual pulses according to the RR intervals so that a connected signal is created. The model is evaluated on synchronously recorded ECG and PPG signals from the MIMIC and the University of Queensland Vital Signs Dataset databases. The results show that the model PPG signals closely resemble real signal for sinus rhythm, premature beats, as well as for AF. The model is used to study the performance of a low-complexity RR interval-based AF detector on simulated PPG signals with five different pulse types generated using the MIT-BIH AF database at signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) from 0 to 30dB. PPGs composed of pulses with a dicrotic notch tend to increase the rate of false alarms, especially at lower SNRs. The model is capable of generating simulated PPG signals from RR interval series with sinus rhythm, AF, and premature beats. Considering the lack of annotated, public PPG databases with arrhythmias, the simulation of realistic PPG signals based on annotated ECG signals is expected to facilitate the development and testing of PPG-specific AF detectors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.12.016

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sološenko, A., Petrėnas, A., Marozas, V., & Sörnmo, L.
Affiliations
  • Kaunas University of Technology (LT)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Sološenko, Andrius
Venue
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
81
Pages
130-138
ISSN
0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2563404472
Cited by
69
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
photoplethysmogram, atrial fibrillation, RR interval, phenomenological model, extrasystoles, dicrotic notch, atrial fibrillation detection, signal-to-noise ratio, MIT-BIH arrhythmia database, MIMIC dataset
MeSH terms
Heart Rate Determination, Algorithms, Atrial Fibrillation, Computer Simulation, Electrocardiography, Heart Rate, Humans, Models, Cardiovascular, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review