Cited by 202Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Age-related changes in the characteristics of the photoplethysmographic pulse shape at various body sites

Open access
Allen, John, Murray, Alan·2003·Physiological Measurement

Abstract

It is accepted that older subjects have increasing arterial stiffness resulting in changes in the propagation of the pulse to the periphery, and thereby influencing the peripheral pulse timing and shape characteristics. However, this age association with pulse shape is less clear in younger subjects and for different peripheral measurement sites. The aim of this study was to determine the association between age and changes in pulse shape characteristics at the ears, fingers and toes. Photoplethysmography pulse waveforms were recorded non-invasively from the right and left sides at the ears, index fingers and great toes of 116 normal healthy human subjects. Their median age was 41 years (range 13-72) allowing four distinct age groups to be considered (subjects younger than 30 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years and 50 years of age or older). Normalized ear, finger and toe pulse shapes were calculated, for the whole subject group, and for the subjects within each age group. The differences in shape, relative to the oldest group, were also calculated for two distinct regions of interest: the systolic rising edge and the dicrotic notch of the pulse. Subtle, gradual and significant changes in the pulse shape were found at all sites with overall elongation of the systolic rising edge (p < 0.05) and damping of the dicrotic notch (p < 0.05) with age. The overall age-related changes in multi-site PPG pulse shape characteristics at the ear, finger and toe sites have been demonstrated and quantified. Age-matched normal ranges must be considered when evaluating pulses from patients with possible vascular disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0967-3334/24/2/306

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, J., & Murray, A.
Affiliations
Freeman Hospital (GB)
Venue
Physiological Measurement
Published
2003-03-13
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
297-307
ISSN
0967-3334 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982898684
Cited by
202
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiological Measurement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
photoplethysmography, pulse shape, aging, arterial stiffness, pulse wave propagation, dicrotic notch, age-related changes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Arteries, Ear, Female, Fingers, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Plethysmography, Pulsatile Flow, Toes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review