The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of learner-generated videos for YouTube on learning outcomes and satisfaction
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · Cited by 12,604
Mayer, R. E. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811678 · Cited by 7,800
Mayer, R. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781316941355 · Cited by 7,777
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades: Twitter and student engagement
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x · Cited by 1,535
Resampling and Distribution of the Product Methods for Testing Indirect Effects in Complex Models
Williams, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510701758166 · Cited by 1,240
Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019 · Cited by 568
Integrative Motivation: Changes During a Year‐Long Intermediate‐Level Language Course
Gardner, R. C., Masgoret, A. ‐., Tennant, J., & Mihic, L. (2004) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00247.x · Cited by 321
Krauskopf, K., Zahn, C., & Hesse, F. W. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.010 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of youtube
Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2018) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001 · Cited by 398
How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review
Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010 · Cited by 334
A Systematic Review of Social Media Use and Adolescent Identity Development
Avci, H., Baams, L., & Kretschmer, T. (2025) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-024-00251-1 · Cited by 104
“YouTube offers extensive educational content (Orús et al., 2016 ), which can reinforce young people’s identities within educational domains.”
Learning-by-Teaching Without Audience Presence or Interaction: When and Why Does it Work?
Lachner, A., Hoogerheide, V., van Gog, T., & Renkl, A. (2022) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09643-4 · Cited by 77
Student-created video: an active learning approach in online environments
Campbell, L. O., Heller, S., & Pulse, L. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1711777 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Orús, C., Barlés, M. J., Belanche, D., Casaló, L., Fraj, E., & Gurrea, R.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 254-269
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2273039478
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 49.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
