Cited by 133Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityInternet of Things and AIBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blockchain and Internet of Things: A bibliometric study

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.106525

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 25 references

2 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nguyen, 2018, A survey about consensus algorithms used in blockchain, Inf Process Manag, 14, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–133 of 133

Metadata

Authors
Kamran, M., Khan, H. U., Nisar, W., Farooq, M., & Rehman, S.-U.
Affiliations
COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
Corresponding author
Khan, Hikmat Ullah
Venue
Computers & Electrical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
81
Pages
106525
ISSN
0045-7906 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2997208348
Cited by
133
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 6
FWCI
17.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Electrical Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
blockchain, Internet of Things, Biot, research trends, smart cities, smart healthcare, Internet of Things security, privacy, research funding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review