The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extrusion and rheology characterization of geopolymer nanocomposites used in 3D printing
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This study focused on the suitability of geopolymer mixes for extrusion-based additive manufacturing applications. Geopolymer mixes including alkaline potassium silicate activator with different molar ratios were prepared and evaluated for their rheological responses (e.g. yield stress, viscosity and thixotropy) that influenced their extrudability and buildability. Due to the low yield stress of geopolymers, nanoclay was introduced to enhance their thixotropy, which was assessed by structural breakdown and viscosity recovery tests. An activator-to-binder ratio of 0.35 and water-to-solid ratio of 0.30 were found to work well with a clay addition of 0.5% (i.e. by mass of total binder component). The addition of nanoclay led to an improvement in the rheological properties of geopolymer nanocomposites, which was attributed to the flocculation characteristic of the clay particles. A small-scale bathroom unit was printed by using the developed geopolymer nanocomposite, indicating the suitability of the proposed mix design to be used in 3D printing applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., & Salet, T. (2016) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867 · Cited by 1,257
Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete
Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Materials and Structures · doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z · Cited by 1,218
Rheological requirements for printable concretes
Roussel, N. (2018) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.005 · Cited by 1,203
3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review
Tay, Y. W. D., Panda, B., Paul, S. C., Noor Mohamed, N. A., Tan, M. J., & Leong, K. F. (2017) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2017.1326724 · Cited by 868
Self-citationKazemian, A., Yuan, X., Cochran, E., & Khoshnevis, B. (2017) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.015 · Cited by 774
Effect of surface moisture on inter-layer strength of 3D printed concrete
Sanjayan, J., Nematollahi, B., Xia, M., & Marchment, T. (2018) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.232 · Cited by 713
Digital Concrete: Opportunities and Challenges
Wangler, T., Lloret, E., Reiter, L., Hack, N., Gramazio, F., Kohler, M., Bernhard, M., Dillenburger, B., Buchli, J., Roussel, N., et al. (2016) · RILEM Technical Letters · doi:10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.16 · Cited by 636
Role of water in the synthesis of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer
ZUHUA, Z., XIAO, Y., HUAJUN, Z., & YUE, C. (2009) · Applied Clay Science · doi:10.1016/j.clay.2008.09.003 · Cited by 621
Measurement of tensile bond strength of 3D printed geopolymer mortar
Panda, B., Paul, S. C., Mohamed, N. A. N., Tay, Y. W. D., & Tan, M. J. (2018) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2017.08.051 · Cited by 592
Self-citationPanda, B., & Tan, M. J. (2018) · Ceramics International · doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.031 · Cited by 520
Self-citation
Cited by
Extrusion-based concrete 3D printing from a material perspective: A state-of-the-art review
Mohan, M. K., Rahul, A. V., De Schutter, G., & Van Tittelboom, K. (2021) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103855 · Cited by 384
Zhao, J., Tong, L., Li, B., Chen, T., Wang, C., Yang, G., & Zheng, Y. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127085 · Cited by 369
Recent Advances in 3D Printing of Structured Materials for Adsorption and Catalysis Applications.
Lawson, S., Li, X., Thakkar, H., Rownaghi, A. A., & Rezaei, F. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00060 · Cited by 341
Al Rashid, A., Khan, S. A., G. Al-Ghamdi, S., & Koç, M. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103268 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Panda, B., Unluer, C., & Tan, M. J.
- Venue
- Composites Part B: Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 176
- Pages
- 107290
- ISSN
- 1359-8368 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2968817102
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 18.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extrusion and rheology characterization of geopolymer nanocomposites used in 3D printing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107290
- The paper
- Panda, B., Unluer, C., & Tan, M. J. (2019). Extrusion and rheology characterization of geopolymer nanocomposites used in 3D printing. Composites Part B: Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
