The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A critical review on 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced composites: History, mechanism, materials and properties
Abstract
Abstract Three-dimensional printing (3DP), interchangeably termed as additive manufacturing, is an emerging technology for creating myriad objects with numerous design flexibilities by sequential layering. The research revolving 3DP to develop different high-performance materials is in its young stage and burgeoning exponentially throughout the globe. The widest applications of 3DP technology are found in automobile, aerospace, building, metal and alloy, electronic and biomedical fields. Recently, the opportunity to use fiber as reinforcement in the plastic resin of 3D printed model has contributed significantly to the improvement of mechanical performances of 3D printed composites. In the present review, along with introducing brief history of 3DP, mechanism of embedding different continuous fibers into different plastics and their microstructural and mechanical properties including predicting models have been critically reviewed. Additionally, based on the limitations of current technology future research directions have been defined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges
Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 · Cited by 8,431
3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective
Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., & Hui, D. (2017) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 · Cited by 3,325
A Fatigue Failure Criterion for Fiber Reinforced Materials
Hashin, Z., & Rotem, A. (1973) · Journal of Composite Materials · doi:10.1177/002199837300700404 · Cited by 1,749
Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials
Chia, H. N., & Wu, B. M. (2015) · Journal of Biological Engineering · doi:10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 · Cited by 1,734
Chacón, J. M., Caminero, M. A., García-Plaza, E., & Núñez, P. J. (2017) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 · Cited by 1,603
A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites
Parandoush, P., & Lin, D. (2017) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 · Cited by 1,270
Three-dimensional printing of continuous-fiber composites by in-nozzle impregnation
Matsuzaki, R., Ueda, M., Namiki, M., Jeong, T.-K., Asahara, H., Horiguchi, K., Nakamura, T., Todoroki, A., & Hirano, Y. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep23058 · Cited by 1,171
Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites
Tian, X., Liu, T., Yang, C., Wang, Q., & Li, D. (2016) · Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 · Cited by 1,162
FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review
Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., & Marinescu, R. (2018) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 · Cited by 1,015
An investigation into 3D printing of fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites
Blok, L. G., Longana, M. L., Yu, H., & Woods, B. K. S. (2018) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039 · Cited by 866
Cited by
Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., & Tran, P. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12071529 · Cited by 1,052
Shanmugam, V., Das, O., Babu, K., Marimuthu, U., Veerasimman, A., Johnson, D. J., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., Ramakrishna, S., & Berto, F. (2021) · International Journal of Fatigue · doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106007 · Cited by 538
Metadata
- Authors
- Kabir, S. M. F., Mathur, K., & Seyam, A.-F. M.
- Venue
- Composite Structures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 232
- Pages
- 111476
- ISSN
- 0263-8223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2974019181
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 25.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
