Cited by 123Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesIon Channels and Receptors

Neural processing of gustatory information in insular circuits

Open access
Maffei, Arianna, Haley, Melissa, Fontanini, Alfredo·2012·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

The insular cortex is the primary cortical site devoted to taste processing. A large body of evidence is available for how insular neurons respond to gustatory stimulation in both anesthetized and behaving animals. Most of the reports describe broadly tuned neurons that are involved in processing the chemosensory, physiological and psychological aspects of gustatory experience. However little is known about how these neural responses map onto insular circuits. Particularly mysterious is the functional role of the three subdivisions of the insular cortex: the granular, the dysgranular and the agranular insular cortices. In this article we review data on the organization of the local and long-distance circuits in the three subdivisions. The functional significance of these results is discussed in light of the latest electrophysiological data. A view of the insular cortex as a functionally integrated system devoted to processing gustatory, multimodal, cognitive and affective information is proposed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2012.04.001

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maffei, A., Haley, M., & Fontanini, A.
Affiliations
State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Fontanini, Alfredo
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
709-716
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058904085
Cited by
123
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC010389, R03DC008885)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
insula, taste processing, multimodal integration, emotional processing, cognitive processes
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Neurons, Taste, Gastrointestinal Tract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review