Cited by 133

Extracellular vesicles: interneural shuttles of complex messages

Krämer-Albers, Eva-Maria, Hill, Andrew F·2016·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

A core function of neural cells is the exchange and integration of information. Extracellular vesicles such as exosomes and microvesicles recently entered the scene of neuroscience as novel vehicles transmitting complex signals between neural cells. Carrying a defined but mixed cargo of biomolecules, extracellular vesicles possess versatile biological activities with the ability to profoundly modulate the molecular configuration and behaviour of target cells. Extracellular vesicles are suggested to carry out functions during neural development and maintenance, they appear to spread neuropathology and furthermore, convey neuroprotection and regeneration. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of this sophisticated cellular crosstalk will fundamentally improve our insight in complex intercellular processes in the healthy and diseased nervous system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2016.04.016

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krämer-Albers, E.-M., & Hill, A. F.
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
39
Pages
101-107
ISSN
0959-4388
Cited by
133
References
7
Language
en
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Australian Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review